"National Socialism is a world view that stands in sharpest opposition to the present day world of capitalism and its Marxist and bourgeois satellites" - Gottfried Feder.
"This morning I would like to talk about the good society. More specifically, I would like to discuss the economic and social aspects of a good society.
Among other things in such a society, we would want a stable and prosperous economy, one with full employment and living wages. We would want affordable housing, whether in the purchasing or renting of a home. We would want a system of health care accessible to everyone, regardless of economic circumstance. We would want generous provision for disability, maternity leave and retirement. We would want free access to college education and vocational training for any qualified applicant. We would want a healthy farming community, one which favors small family farms over large agribusiness conglomerates.
We would want the kind of public safety where one didn't have to live in gated communities to feel secure, and where one could walk down the street of any city at any time, day or night-without fear of being mugged, assaulted, or worse. We would want rigorous protection of the environment under a regime that is more concerned about the condition of our forests, our earth, our air and our waters than about corporate profit and pollution.
These are some the things we would want - for every citizen of our good society. Today, we have NONE of these things. Why? Do these expectations of a good society sound unreasonable, or utopian? I say to you that they are not - as is proven by the fact that there once was a society which had all of these things and more." -Matt Koehl
I wanted to add a little more to Mr. Koehl's speech here with an analogy.
I'm going to use Walmart as an example.
Walmart eliminates the chances of small family owned businesses or entrepreneurial businesses to succeed, by selling the same products at lower prices. They can do this because of the balk quantities purchased by the retail giant. And everyone knows when you buy in bulk you get it cheaper, so cheaper sale prices for the public.
Small hardware stores, small neighborhood grocery stores, flower shops, shoe stores, delis, bakeries, you name it. Any small "family owned" business will fail because Walmart will have it cheaper.
Now the towns or neighborhoods where these small businesses once flourished are hurting because these store fronts are closed, leaving behind abandoned buildings.
Now that these small business owners are out of work, they and their employees, are all working for the Walmart. This creates a town that is dependent on this mega store for its economic and employment stability. Also it eliminates any chance of entrepreneurial success. It's called monopolizing, small towns in Middle America know this story all too well.
This is just a small scale example of how entrepreneurialism works with the people and therefor works with the nation. If a nation has independent, stable and successful businesses, then that nation can remain stable, successful and INDEPENDENT.
Now think of Walmart as the European Union and how they have begun to monopolize Europe by taking away each nations individual monetary system and replacing it with the Euro. It's just another step closer to Globalism, one global economic system, one global bank. In fact Jean-Claude Trichet President of the European Central bank and one of the richest Jewish men on the planet, is calling for exactly that. He told Forbes that "global governance is extremely necessary if we want to prevent another financial crisis."
The separate Nations of the world act as small businesses in this analogy, Walmart of course, acts as the European Central Bank, a bank striving to be a Global bank with one economic system.
If we, the people of our respected nations, allow this to continue, the world will become a town that can not achieve anything more than a Walmart paycheck.
"If one were to define its aim and its spirit, and its essential contribution to the regeneration of mankind, in one sentence, one should say that National Socialism has set up the conception of the natural and therefore eternal aristocracy of blood and of personal value, against that of the artificial aristocracy of class and capital; that it stands for the divinely decreed human hierarchy, against all the false barriers established by man. For that is the meaning of the doctrine of race and personality, those "two pillars supporting the whole edifice" of the National Socialist Philosophy. "
"There is no, properly speaking, no nationhood apart from racial homogeneity. A country of many races can not be a nation in the sense we understand that word. If one wishes to give the whole population the illusion of unity in a view of some definite practical purpose ( in view for instance, the coalescing of different races against forces which one has one self, good reason to fight). But that will not alter the fact that this feeling of unity will remain an illusion so long as the population consists of separate races.
In a racially homogeneous nation -a real nation- any idea of class, based upon acquired nobility, or upon wealth or learning is artificial and anti-national. It only hinders the spontaneous feeling of racial solidarity, on which healthy nationhood rests, for "one can only be proud of ones nation if there is no class of which one must feel ashamed." Hence National Socialism. " -Savitri Devi
This is a collection of videos, news clips, quotes from some of my favorite authors and some of my own writings, explaining the views and opinions of the Nationalist political platform. This collection will expose the Zionist occupation of American and European government and media, proving how obvious and dangerous that occupation is for the world and it's respective Nations.
NATIONALISM
Nationalism was the most successful political force of the 19th century. It emerged from two main sources: the Romantic exaltation of "feeling" and "identity" and the Liberal requirement that a legitimate state be based on a "people" rather than, for example, a dynasty, God, or imperial domination. Both Romantic "identity nationalism" and Liberal "civic nationalism" were essentially middle class movements. - Modern History Sourcebook
excellent argument against supranational central banks, I couldn't agree more. The Walmart analogy is great in that it provides such an accessible explanation for the layman. I do also find myself in agreement with Koehl's aims, although I may be in disagreement with the type of society that can achieve this.
ReplyDeleteYou already know my disagreements about racial nationalism hahaha maybe it's because I'm not white :P
I understand what you are saying but being Korean, Japanese, Black, Mexican or what have you, is no reason you can't protect your culture, your people, and a future for your nation.
ReplyDeleteJust as long as it doesn't exploit, or infringe on another nations goals or freedoms, nations can coexist. It's like being friends with your neighbors, its easy to do, as long as you aren't living in the same house.
the globe can be shared, nations can not.