die for lies

This was posted in 2005 on DavidDuke.com
I stumbled across it while doing some laid back research.

Why Cindy Sheehan is Right!
By David Duke

Cindy Sheehan, a mother who lost a son in the Iraq War, is determined to prevent other mothers and fathers from experiencing the same loss.

Courageously she has gone to Texas near the ranch of President Bush and braved the elements and a hostile Jewish supremacist media to demand a meeting with him and a good explanation why her son and other’s sons and daughters must die and be disfigured in a war for Israel rather than for America.

Recently, she had the courage to state the obvious that her son signed up in the military to protect America not to die for Israel.

In a recent letter to “Nightline,” she wrote the following hard-hitting words:

Am I emotional? Yes, my first born was murdered. Am I angry? Yes, he was killed for lies and for a PNAC Neo-Con agenda to benefit Israel. My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel. Am I stupid? No, I know full-well that my son, my family, this nation, and this world were betrayed by George [W.] Bush who was influenced by the neo-con PNAC agenda after 9/11. We were told that we were attacked on 9/11 because the terrorists hate our freedoms and democracy…not for the real reason, because the Arab-Muslims who attacked us hate our middle-eastern foreign policy. That hasn’t changed since America invaded and occupied Iraq…in fact it has gotten worse.

Now, a gauntlet of personal attacks has been let out against her. A recent article on David Horowitz’s FrontPage and repeated by many pro-Israel zealots dares to compare her with that incorrigible American, me. Here is a FrontPage reader’s commentary published in the Lonestar Times.

…(Sheehan) voiced vaguely anti-Semitic rhetoric when she alleged that the Iraq War was all about protecting Israel, i.e. a Jewish conspiracy (a similar opinion is frequently expressed by David Duke and his ilk).” — From the Lonestar Times August, 13, 2005

In truth, Cindy Sheehan is absolutely right. Her son signed up in the military to defend America, not Israel, and to safeguard our own democracy, not the democracy of some foreign nation that neither wants nor needs it. In advancing this war for Israel, government and media advocates obviously couldn’t get Americans behind the war by saying it was a war for Israel. They had to make up bogus reasons for the war, such as saying that Iraq was an imminent threat to America and that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Now that these lies have been exposed, they have changed the rationale for the war to “fighting for democracy” and “fighting against terrorism.” Here’s a short list showing why Cindy Sheehan is right!

1) It was criminal for Cindy Sheehan’s son to die for Israel rather than for the true interests of America.

From the beginning, this war was orchestrated from top to bottom by Jewish Neocons that saw the war as one for Israel’s strategic objectives. They ramped up the war through Jews such as Perle and Wolfowitz, the false intelligence through CIA analyst Stuart Cohen and by Israel’s Mossad, and had a compliant Jewish-dominated media to cheer on the war. The truth is the Iraq War has inflicted incredible damage on America and the American people. It is war against America rather than in defense of America.

2) It was criminal to send her son to die for a lie.

There were no weapons of mass destruction, no nuclear program, no uranium from Niger, no links with Al Qaeda, no imminent threat to the American people. Every reason the American people were given for going to war has turned out to be a lie.

3) It is criminal for her son to be forced to die for democracy in other ountries.

If Americans were sent to die for democracy or justice in all the countries of the world we deem unjust or undemocratic, then we must be ready to send millions of our sons and daughters to war all over the globe.

4) The lie that her son died for the good of the Iraqi People is false on its face.

Hundreds of thousands of Iraq men women and children have been killed, injured, made homeless and suffered from this war. You don’t save people by destroying their homes and hospitals, and throwing their country in chaos.

5) The Iraq war and her son’s death did not defend American from hatred or terrorism.

In fact, the war is massively increasing hatred and terrorism. For every one terrorist killed in Iraq, we are creating thousands more who hate and want to hurt America and Americans. This is the surest way to lose the war on terror not win it.

6) Cindy Sheehan’s son died for no true interest for the American people.

It has secured us no new or cheaper oil, it has cost a national treasure of hundreds of billions of dollars, it has alienated friends and allies, it has hurt American business around the world, it has separated and caused hardship upon millions of American military and National Guard families. It has killed almost 2000 and maimed tens of thousands of loyal and brave Americans who do their duty in Iraq. Again, this is war against every true interest of the America. The only nation that benefits from it is Israel!

Cindy Sheehan has a lot to be angry about. Her son was betrayed and his life lost by government officials who treasonably created and continue a war for Israel and the Jewish supremacist agenda rather than that of the United States.

We stand with Cindy Sheehan and the memory of her son which should spur all truly patriotic Americans to demand an end to this war for Israel, this war against America, the Iraq War.

It is not Iraq’s borders that need protecting, it is the American border with Mexico!
(see blog post "Aztlan Rising" in August archives, for more on this subject.)
Support our troops…bring them home!

Let them protect America and not die for Israel.

Sincerely,

David Duke

The undold stories of Jewish Extremism

If you aren't interested in the message put forth by this blog, the message of Dr. David Duke or other nationalists, because of the "anti-semetic" or racist views you believe they posses, please give this video one watch, its just over 23 minutes. If you still hold fast to your feelings of distrust in us, than I don't know how to reach you.

One thing we call all agree on, is that the media lies.
Why then believe the media's "coverage" of Dr. David Duke, or other organizations with a similar message?

This 23 minute video is a great preface to all the other Duke videos posted on this blog exposing Jewish supremacy.
Dr. Duke is labeled an Anti-Semite, racist and hater by the Jewish dominated media, because he exposes exactly that; racism, hatred, supremacy and the power, that defines the Zionist Jew.
Hopefully this video will generate some curiosity and you will read earlier posts and watch earlier videos that are posted here with an open mind.

I'm going to end this with a quote from a newsletter found on keystoneunited.com
I've posted the entire article back in June, its title : "The Mechanisms of Revolution" By Keith Carney.

"the fact that we cannot eradicate thoughts & ideas through the use of terror or force of any kind must be taken into account at all times.

Propaganda and the destructive concepts of communism, multiculturalism, and Zionism have been deeply embedded into American culture for decades. These things can only be destroyed by rendering them useless and undermining & exposing them to the public through direct education."

The Little Bank that Saved Christmas!

Christmas versus Hanukkah Peace and Love vs War and Hate

Who Taught America to Torture?

I've spoken with some very "liberal" people about Israel, Zionism, "the war on terror" and the plight of the Palestinians. I wanted to know this type of persons opinion on Israel and the fact they are stealing Palestinian land as we speak.

Their answer was this: " We'll Jews have been oppressed for so long and by so many different people, not just Europeans, that they deserve to have a place exclusively for them"

Really? An "educated" and self labeled "intellectual" feels that since they experienced oppression, that gives them the freedom to oppress.
Secondly, oppression? from who? If you take a look at history, the commies started the torture, wars, concentration camps, and social engineering. Raping and killing MILLIONS. They started the Russian revolution which turned Russia to communism, even though the majority of Russians did not want it.
The people behind the Russian Revolution, The Red Army, Bolshevism, social engineering, Communism and Marxism were not Russians, They were Jews. Some even changed their names to hide their Jewish heritage! here is just one example, Leon Trotsky aka Lev Davidovich Bronshtein. Look it up for yourself of you don't believe me.
Oppression? They are the oppressors!

How is it that a college educated person is unaware of these FACTS?
They planted the seeds of propaganda into the minds of college academics with their Marxist, progressive, and critical theories, when members of the Frankfurt school came to America. They directly influenced the social and sexual revolution of the 1960's.
Columbia university, a very respected university, is where members of the Frankfurt School landed, while fleeing the Nazi's in 1934.

"The Frankfurt School refers to a school of neo-Marxist interdisciplinary social theory, particularly associated with the Institute for Social Research at the University of Frankfurt am Main. The school initially consisted of dissident Marxists who believed that some of Marx's followers had come to parrot a narrow selection of Marx's ideas, in defense of orthodox Communist parties." -wikipedia

Do you think their influence on Academia would be at all biased? Absolutely, that is exactly why there are more and more hard left, uber-liberal "intellectuals" than there are conservatives, especially in the more recent generations of college graduates.

If you don't believe our academia is biased, or left leaning, please explain to me how it's not common knowledge that the Russian revolution, The Red Army, Bolshevism, Marxism and communism was started, led and financed by Jews?
Why is the holocaust common knowledge and the murderous Bolshevik Red Army, is something some people never even heard of?

If you don't understand where I am going with this, in a nut shell, they are lying, denying and hiding Jewish, not only involvement but leadership, in the bloody communist revolution. While over exposing their enemies as "anti-semetic" Jewish oppressors. At the same time, comparing the political persuasions of their "evil, anti-semetic" enemies, with the political persuasions of their own. This causes the damnation of nationalism and creates a sympathetic view of communism as the sociopolitical movement of the "oppressed".

Pedro Varela Imprisoned in Spain for Selling Politically Incorrect Books! Where are the so-called defenders of human rights?”

Pedro Varela Imprisoned in Spain for Selling Politically Incorrect Books! Where are the so-called defenders of human rights?”

Spanish dissident sent to prison

BARCELONA — To all my friends and supporters around the world!

My close friend, Spanish dissident Pedro Varela, has been sent to a Catalonian prison to begin serving a one-year three-month sentence for disseminating Politically Incorrect materials.

Mr. Varela is the owner of the Barcelona bookshop Librería Europa was accused of disseminating books that dare to have opinions that conflict with the orthodoxy of the mass media. He has dared to publish books by historians, educators, political figures and others who have disagree with the controlled media. The Zionists control the mass media, TV, Movies, Newspapers, Magazine and Book publishing. That same media puts out endless sick garbage promoting sadism, masochism, violence, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, the destruction of the Palestinian people and the wars that have racked this world and killed millions of innocents, but they cannot bear the freedom of one man who has a tiny bookshop and who publishes just a few thousand copies of politically incorrect books. No, they cannot afford one tiny expression of dissidence to their evil! So they send their thugs to kidnap him from this family and imprison him for having the courage to act according to his conscience.

Pedro has suffered for years under court case after court case. His book shop has been destroyed by Communist and Jewish extremist mobs and he and his patrons have been physically attacked. I was there personally for a speech when we were attacked and the store was shattered by club wielding terrorists who also burned and attacked the neighborhood and injured many innocents. All of this because he has made available books that dared to intellectually question and offering countering evidence or opinion on aspects of the Second World War and that one HOLY event called the Holocaust. As the Iranian President Ahmadinejad so correctly stated. “In the West one may freely question God, any and every historical event, but cannot even ask legitimate questions about the “The Holocaust.” It is the only historical event in Western countries that can’t be questioned in any way. If someone has even the slightest disagreement on any aspect of the official Holocaust story, he or she can face years in prison.

As Mr. Varela pointed out, the laws in Europe today are actually more draconian than those of the Inquisition during the Middle Ages. In the Middle Ages the Church put out a list of proscribed books, the law was clear. Today, one publishes a book and then finds out that he has somehow offended the masters of the modern age by completely capricious standards and finds himself kidnapped and jailed for simply uttering his opinion or simply publishing the opinion of someone else.

Whether or not one agrees with Mr. Varela’s opinions, or even the opinions expressed in the books that he published, everyone who truly believes in the basic human right of freedom of speech, thought and expression, should protest this man’s imprisonment and kidnapping from his work, his wife and his children simply for allowing dissenting academic opinions to be heard and published!

If a jailed Chinese free speech activist should win the Nobel Prize, why not Pedro Varela, for he has fought and sacrificed for true free speech in the same way? What hypocrisy for the West to criticize China or Iran for suppression of speech and thought when there are thousands of Europeans jailed for having “wrong” opinions or beliefs about historical events that happened over 65 years ago!

Whether or not one agrees with what the media says are the beliefs of Pedro Varela, the imprisonment of this courageous, NON-VIOLENT, kind and decent, free speech activist is the real crime.

Those who would kidnap a man from his family and imprison him for expressing his political or historical opinion are the real criminals here. They are the ones guilty of the violation of human rights, and indeed, they are the ones who should be sent to prison in a truly free society, not Pedro Varela! It is they who are the real criminals.

I urge all true friends of freedom, and all those who oppose tyranny, and intolerance and violation of human rights — to protest the imprisonment of Pedro Varela!

Here is his address and I hope that every single person reading this will take a moment right now to sit down and write him a letter wishing him a Merry Christmas, even while he is behind bars, for he is a man who even through the hardship he now faces, should hear from all of us how he respect him and honor him. He is a real man, a courageous man, a man of principle, unlike those who have imprisoned him in violation of the most elemental of human rights!
Found on davidduke.com

If you are seriously interested in writing Pedro, you can find his address on davidduke.com

Bombs, Body Scans and Israel

religious symbols banned from public places?

The nativity scene and crucifix, have been banned from public places, but Menorah O.K.?

I'm not a "religious" man, I'm not in support of Christianity any more than I am in support of Judaism, but this nation's majority is clearly Christian, they have every right to celebrate their religious culture here in America just as much as the American Jew.
With that said. I can't think of a more public place than in down town Philadelphia, where our Declaration of Independence was signed, Independence Hall.
Just across from Independence Hall stands a building that houses the Liberty Bell, a symbol of this nations liberty and independence. People from all over the world come to Philadelphia to learn and to share in the experience of early American achievement.
This part of Philadelphia is like a museum of American history, there is no more public a place than a museum.

So why is it that there, in the heart of a city that symbolizes American Independence, stands a Jewish RELIGIOUS symbol?
There, a 20-25ft. tall Jewish Menorah stands in between the buildings where OUR Declaration of Independence was signed, and the pavilion that houses the Liberty Bell, symbols of our Nations freedom, liberty and independence.

I find it extremely audacious, to say the least, that not only are Jewish religious symbols erected right on top of our national symbols, but there, right across the street from the Liberty Bell and Independence Hall stands "The National Museum of American Jewish History" opened in 2010.
The Menorah does not stand in front of that museum, which would make more sense even though it is still a public place and "illegal". No, that Menorah, standing 25ft. tall, stares into the face of American Independence.

It's so obvious we are occupied by a foreign people, with allegiances to a foreign land, while we (the majority) are oppressed and disallowed from celebrating or expressing our religious freedom in public places, which technically go hand and hand with the identity of this nation. The Liberty Bell, the Declaration of Independence and the crucifix are symbols of American tradition and culture.
Religious freedom? If we must ban religious symbols in public places we must ban them all.
But that is not the case, we are forced into sacrificing what is American, for "diversity". We Whites have been tricked into believing that preference for our own kind, our own interests, our own traditions or culture is racist. So we stand by idly and in silence. That is why there is no protest against the "illegal" Jewish religious symbol that stands in a sacred and public place.

what do you think would happen if Christians somehow gained access to Israel, who's immigration policy is set for Jews only, and erected a 25ft. tall crucifix next to the wailing wall?
Even though Christians would only make up 2% of Israel's population, do you think we would be a protected minority, like the Jew is here?
No, that crucifix would be burned on site.
Don't believe me? check out this video.




So why is it ok for Jews to protect their religious freedom, protect their heritage and culture? While we are demonized for wanting the same thing?
How much more proof do we need to wake up and start defending ourselves?
How many more times do I have to keep asking this very same question?

No surprise, Racial differences found in SAT scores.

The overall scores on the SAT were unchanged for those who graduated from high school this year, with the critical reading average remaining at 501, the mathematics average going up by 1 point to 516 and the writing score dropping by 1 point to 492.

Scores in all three sections are down modestly from where they were a few years ago. The College Board continued its push, in releasing the scores Monday, to argue that the scores are a measure of academic rigor and that the SAT encourages college preparation. {snip}

But the figures released Monday also show a continuation—and in some cases a growth—of gaps by racial and ethnic group that are much larger than the one or two point shifts in the national averages. The College Board also announced Monday that its figures were counting more students than in the past who took the SAT later in the school year {snip}.

{snip}

The more significant changes are evident when race and ethnicity are factored in. Asian-American test takers gained 13 points this year (across all three parts of the SAT), followed by Mexican Americans, who gained 7 points. Comparing scores over two years, Asian Americans gained 26 points, Mexican Americans gained 5 points, and all other groups lost ground (modestly). Asian Americans now outscore African Americans by 90 points on reading, 163 points on math, and 106 points on writing. Asian Americans score better than all other groups on all parts of the test—except that the white average exceeds the Asian American average on the reading portion. On that portion of the test, however, Asian Americans gained 3 points this year, while white scores were flat.

Another demographic trend that continued this year—as in all past years—was the apparent link between family income and SAT scores. {snip}

Another of the demographic indicators—all cited by those who criticize the role of the SAT—is parental education. The more education parents have, on average, the better a student’s SAT scores. {snip}

{snip}
Found on AmRen.com

Also, the New York Times reports; "According to data from the National Assessment for Educational Progress, Black children are falling behind at an alarming rate and from a very young age, despite school reforms and economic status.
Only 12% of black 4th grade boys are proficient in reading, compared with 38% of white boys."

Why is it that year after year, the results of the SAT scores, differentiate according to race? Ever since schools have been diversified this problem has existed. People will never achieve at equal levels. The racial divide is natural, it's genetic, all attempts to fix this "problem" are futile.

I see test scores have gone up for Asian Americans and slightly for Mexican Americans. While White test scores have, on average, stayed the same. I don't think the argument that these tests are "culturally biased" really holds any water, but I'm sure they'll come up with something new, to take away from White achievement and at the same time blame us for Blacks lagging behind, again.
Let me be clear, I don't think blacks are stupid any more than I think Asians are geniuses. I just want to point out that it isn't White racism, which egalitarians have used to explain away black "underachievement".

Blaming White racism for the oppression of blacks in the education system or for that matter, in any part of the system is extremely dangerous. Just think of the double edge sword this kind of thinking creates. The majority of Whites who believe this, I'm sure feel some sort of guilt or responsibility, while (I can only imagine) the majority of blacks who believe this must feel contempt and resentment towards whites, what else would you feel?
I'm basing my opinion, on the general attitude blacks have towards whites in hip-hop lyrics, stand-up comedy, poetry, paintings and other forms of black expression.
(See blog post "straight up ... hate" for more on this subject)

How in the world can you create a diversified yet civilized society when you are basing everything on race being irrelevant? IT CAN NOT BE DONE.

The sooner we realize race matters, the sooner we can start to understand each other.

see earlier blog post in July archives : "a social construct; race or racism"
for more on this subject.

How Zionists Divide and Conquer

This video really lights a fire inside of me. I hope it does the same for you.




It's kind of hard to deny these irrefutable facts, told by the Jewish elite themselves.

After watching this video, if there is anyone who still believes that nationalists are just blind haters, racists, and anti-semites. You might need to seriously consider checking yourself into a mental institution, for your own good and the good of the world, because you are a danger to civilized society.

How can anyone of good conscience, who is informed about the Zionist global agenda, the Jewish domination of international banking, their self proclaimed ownership of media and entertainment, their leading role in massive immigration into America and Europe, while keeping safe the nation of Israel with monetary support from the nations they corrupt, stand by and watch what is OURS disappear?

NO WAR FOR ISRAEL IN IRAN !

Found on DavidDuke.com

The corporate media have been given their orders to throw the focus back on to Iran. Here is a recap of what the Zionist controlled media is trying to make you forget.

1. Last Spring, Rose Gottemoeller, an assistant secretary of state and Washington’s chief nuclear arms negotiator, asked Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel refused.

2. The United Nations passed a resolution calling on Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and to submit to inspections. Israel refused.

3. The IAEA asked Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and to submit to inspections. Israel refused.

4. Iran’s formal notification to the IAEA of the planned construction of the backup fuel-rod facility underscores that Iran is playing by the rules of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which Iran has signed.

5. Iran allows IAEA inspections of all its facilities.

6. Contrary to face-saving claims, it appears that the US and Israel were both caught off guard by Iran’s announcement. The reasoning is simple. Had the US or Israel announced the existence of the new facility before Iran notified the IAEA, it would have put Iran on the defensive. As it is now, the US and Israel seem to be playing catch up, casting doubt on the veracity of Israel’s claims to “know” that Iran is a nuclear threat.

7. The IAEA and all 16 United States Intelligence Agencies are unanimous in agreement that Iran is not building, and does not possess, nuclear weapons.

8. In 1986, Mordachai Vanunu blew the whistle and provided photographs showing Israel’s clandestine nuclear weapons factory underneath the reactor at Dimona.

9. Israel made the same accusations against Iraq that it is now making against Iran, leading up to Israel’s bombing of the power station at Osirik. Following the invasion of 2003, international experts examined the ruins of the power station at Osirik and found no evidence of a clandestine weapons factory in the rubble.

10. The United Nations has just released the Goldstone Report, a scathing report which accuses Israel of 37 specific war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza earlier this year. Israel has denounced the report as “Anti-Semitic (even though Judge Goldstone is himself Jewish), and the United States will block the report from being referred to the War Crimes Tribunal at the Hague, thereby making the US Government an accessory after-the-fact.

11. Recently revealed documents prove not only that Israel has nuclear weapons, but that it actually tried to sell some to Apartheid South Africa. Who else Israel approached to sell nuclear weapons remains an unasked question.

12. In 1965, Israel stole over 200-600 pounds of weapons-grade uranium from the United States.

13. Declassified documents from the former South African regime prove not only that Israel has had nuclear weapons for decades, but that it has tried to sell them to other countries! We all need to be Joe Wilson right now. We need to stand up and scream, “LIAR!” at every politician and every talking media moron that is pushing this war in Iran. And we need to keep doing it until they get the message that we will not be deceived anymore. Israel wants to send your kids off to die in Iran, and YOU are the only one that can stop them.

Tim Wise hates White People

Kevin MacDonald

November 4, 2010

Readers of TOO are familiar with Tim Wise (see Mark Green: My Smackdown with Anti-White Crusader Tim Wise; see also here and here.) The general theme is that Wise presents himself as a White crusader against White privilege and injustice when in fact he is Jewish. His attitude toward the White majority is typical of Jews and, as with the vast majority of American Jews, he has directed all his energies against White “racism” in America and against apartheid South Africa while pretty much avoiding the issue of Jewish ethnocentrism and apartheid in Israel.

Wise’s comments on the election are a must read for every White person in America (“An Open Letter to the White Right, On the Occasion of Your Recent, Successful Temper Tantrum“).

The hatred is palpable. We at TOO have continually harped on the theme that Whites are beset by a hostile elite and that when we become a minority we will be physically endangered—just as the ethnic Russians and Ukrainians saw their elites eradicated and millions of their people murdered by the hostile elite that ruled the USSR (see also Solzhenitsyn’s 200 Years Together). It is very dangerous for any ethnic group to give up political power and control. Voluntarily giving up power to ethnic groups that hold historical grudges is insane.

Realize that Wise addresses his letter to the “White Right.” But the Whites who voted Republican are a majority of Whites of all social classes. Make no mistake about it, Wise is directing his comments at the great majority of White Americans.

I agree with Wise’s basic point—that the clock is ticking on White America because of the increasing power of non-Whites. But notice how he phrases it:

"The kind of math … proves how your kind — mostly older white folks beholden to an absurd, inaccurate, nostalgic fantasy of what America used to be like — are dying.

You’re like the bad guy in every horror movie ever made, who gets shot five times, or stabbed ten, or blown up twice, and who will eventually pass — even if it takes four sequels to make it happen — but who in the meantime keeps coming back around, grabbing at our ankles as we walk by, we having been mistakenly convinced that you were finally dead this time.

Fair enough, and have at it. But remember how this movie ends. Our ankles survive.

You do not."

This is not the place to go into detail on Wise’s warped view of American history–that the end of slavery, the rights of women and the end of child labor were all advocated by majorities of White Americans. Does he really think that children would be better off in, say, China? Or that women would be better off if they were treated like they are in the Arab world or in Africa?As the recent election shows, the anti-White revolution that is sweeping away Whites is not favored by most Whites and that is becoming increasingly evident. That’s why Wise has to rely on the demographic triumph of non-Whites to achieve the destruction of Whites that that he so fervently desires. But realize that the end of White power will mean the end of all White-created institutions, including constitutional government, democratic representation and the rule of law—all creations of White Americans deriving from their ethnic proclivities and absent in pretty much the rest of the non-White world. Does Wise really look forward to a country that is run like typical African countries or like Mexico? As Enoch Powell said, our future is rivers of blood.

Wise is ecstatic about the demise of White America, but he claims he does not mean to physically destroy Whites, just let them die off.

"And I do not mean by that your physical destruction. We don’t play those games. We’re not into the whole “Second Amendment remedies, militia, armed resistance” bullshit that your side fetishizes, cuz, see, we don’t have to be. We don’t need guns.

We just have to be patient.

And wait for your hearts to stop beating.

Do you hear it?

The sound of your empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently?

Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.

So know this.

If you thought this election was payback for 2008, remember…

Payback, thy name is…

Temporary."

Tim Wise is just another "anti-racist", anti-American, far-left, Jewish HYPOCRITE!
Not one mention of Israel and their race-based immigration policy or their illegal occupation and building of settlements on the left bank. Not one mention of Israel's bombing of the Gaza strip, where Palestinian civilians are now living as refugees, because they can not return to their homes!
All of this, and he is more worried about the "mostly older white folks beholden to an absurd, inaccurate, nostalgic fantasy of what America used to be like..."

So lets get this straight, Tim Wise believes "Israel has a right to exist". He doesn't mind if Israel has a nation that is strictly for people of the same ethnic, cultural and religious back round, but hates whites for wanting the same thing.

There is the hypocrisy, Israel does have a right to exist, but every nation has that right, including white nations.

This man is definitely for "progress" alright, to progressively strengthen Israel and progressively destroy white nations with liberal border policies. As for whites who oppose such policies, well according to him, they are racists who want to protect white power, all while keeping quiet about the racist border policies and segregated settlements in Israel. (If you are unaware of Israeli policies, check out older blog posts in my archives, they are 100% factual, you can research them if you'd like.)
This is just a means of distraction, whites are evil and racist, while according to this Jew, Jews are victims. I believe psychologist call this type of behavior "projecting".

The scary thing is, this man has lectured since 1995 at over 600 college campuses across the US. He has trained teachers, corporate employees, non-profit organizations and law enforcement officers in methods for addressing and dismantling "racism" in their institutions.
Basically he is guilt tripping whites into dismantling their own institutions.

Rape and Reality in America

Top Rabbi Exposes Jewish Racism!

The funny thing about this is, if you go to youtube and check out the comments left by viewers, most of the people are still hung up on David Duke being a "racist". They're blowing this video off, as if its "anti-semetic babble".
These aren't the opinions of an anti-semite, these are facts, irrefutable facts.
The fact Dr. Duke was a member of the K.K.K. as a young man, will never be forgotten and that fact has received relentless media coverage at the time.
This video reveals racism, not only in Israel or Zionism, but in the Jewish faith itself. that's a fact.
But no media coverage, none, none at all. And that's a fact.
This is more evidence that our media is controlled, along with our brains and emotions. It's about right and wrong, lies and facts, and the ability to tell the difference no matter how emotionally attached to an opinion we may be. In the end "Truth is truth, no matter who tells it".
Please, open your mind.

Philadelphia Leif Ericson Day Celebration: a Retrospective

The Leif Ericson Day celebration that takes place every October is completely and totally harmless. It's a family oriented day of celebrating the achievements of our founding fathers.
The fact that this day is recognized exclusively by whites presumably makes this a racist event. That is the logic behind the protest of the Leif Ericson Day celebration by the one peoples project.
Any white assembly is considered racist, even if it's friends, families and their children, listening to live Celtic music, barbecuing in the park and sharing a common bond. With the suppression of white pride and constant demonization of white culture, I really shouldn't be surprised.

Do you think you would find the ANTIFA, one peoples project or any other "anti-racist" group, protesting any event culturally relevant to any other race?


I personally attended one of these events and found their presence to be shocking to say the least, they stood in front of the statue and tried to disrupt our time spent there. After their actions did nothing to deter our planned event, later they threw red paint all over the Thorfinn Karlsefni (Scandinavian explorer) Statue in frustration. They vandalized a piece of art, in "protest" of white achievement, culture and pride.
All in the name of "anti-racism".
Check out some pictures and a more in depth story on the vandals here,
http://antiantifa-usa.blogspot.com/2008/11/thorfinn-karlsefni-statue-vandalized-in.html

This is a video posted by the one peoples project and the Philadelphia ANTIFA. They try their best to make themselves seem triumphant, but They stopped nothing and they never will, this year's celebration just hasn't taken place yet.

Sex and Lies in Israel - By Dr. David Duke

Black-on-White Hate Crime: Where’s the Outrage?

Shane McClellan is a Seattle victim of a violent hate crime. The following is an interview with African American, Erik Rush, author of Negrophilia. We at DavidDuke.com oppose all crimes against all races.–Admin)

‘Hate crime’ charges
filed over heinous attack
But author says case remains under radar because the victim is white.

It’s a criminal case whose victim bears the scars of a particularly heinous brutality – and whose motivation recalls the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. murders that outraged the nation.

But because it “fails to fit a preapproved script, you probably haven’t even heard about it,” says Erik Rush, author of a controversial new book on racial politics and manipulation.

“Were this a white-on-black hate crime,” said Rush, “there is no escaping the fact that it would be national news for months, and every prominent black career civil rights activist in America would be calling for the death penalty.”

The crime in question: Sixteen-year-old Shane McClellan walked from a friend’s place to his West Seattle home. At 2 a.m., McClellan says two men asked him for a lighter. The men robbed him, beat him and “forced him up the stairs to a dead end and held him against his will for several hours,” reports the Seattle Post Intelligencer.

“During this time,” Det. Suzanne Moore wrote in a probable-cause document, “they beat him with their hands and feet, whipped him with his own belt, burned him with a lit cigarette, poured energy beer on him and urinated on him.”

The report, which recounted the injuries to McClellan’s face, ears, head, back and teeth, noted his alleged assailants – Ahmed Mohamed, who’s black, and Jonathan Baquiring, who’s Asian – taunted him with racial remarks during the attack.

Mohamed and Baquiring, reports Seattle’s KOMO News, held him at gunpoint and, “stripped off McClellan’s belt and started whipping his back.”

“They said, ‘This is for what your people did to our people.’ They were like whipping me with my belt, my studded belt,” KOMO News reported McClellan as saying.

The incident occurred May 25 but only made headlines after recent police arrests, charging Mohamed and Baquiring with a hate crime. Even still, media coverage remains limited mostly to Seattle, something Rush said he finds “both baffling and revealing.”

Rush is the author of the new WND Books title, “Negrophilia: From Slave Block to Pedestal – America’s Racial Obsession.” NewsBlaze’s Claudia Strasbaugh recently recommended the book as, “worth every penny – love it or hate it, this is a book you won’t forget.”

“Certainly, this crime is no more or less heinous than would be a white-on-black hate crime,” said Rush, who was the first to expose nationally the anti-American sermons of President Obama’s longtime pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. “But I am interested to see what the judicial system in liberal Seattle and the establishment press make of this. So far, the latter has said next to nothing.”

As Rush recently said in an interview with Family Security Matters, “The Left has pretty much got the reins on the press, and a lot of the news bureau chiefs and the journalists are likeminded people who went to a lot of the same universities, they were schooled in hard Left journalism. They really have lost that concern for what the truth is.”

That “bent makes them highly susceptible to negrophilia,” he explained. Race-baiters’ unseen tool is “negrophilia,” says Rush, “an undue and inordinate affinity for blacks,” combined with the “reflexive demonization of whites as inherently wicked.” It’s rooted in leftist tactics of division and aimed at advancing policies that keep blacks “obedient,” whites “silent” and “political control” secure.

“Propped up by the press, this manipulation seeps into society in ways we scarcely detect until we don’t hear about crimes like this,” Rush added.

Rush said he wasn’t surprised at the language of avenging slavery that the black and Asian alleged assailants reportedly spouted. In a recent interview with Capitol Weekly, Rush explained how negrophilia is colorblind in who it afflicts.

“In addition to fostering an erroneous perception of whites by black and blacks by whites, it’s also expanded into less than healthy and constructive relationships between blacks and whites and other ethnic groups,” he said.

Adding intrigue to the attack, police initially questioned and released Mohamed and Baquiring after McClellan reported the crime. The Seattle Times reported that the officer who took the report visited the scene and found blood, beer cans and fresh cigarette butts. Shortly after leaving the scene, he spotted two men fitting the victim’s description and trying to hide an open container.

“When he stopped to talk to the two men,” the Seattle Times reported, “he noted they had dried blood on their hands and were drinking the same brand of energy beer and smoking the same brand of cigarettes he’d found earlier.”

He told his supervisor, but it “was decided that he should get good contact information on the two but not take them into custody.” He did take DNA swabs from the blood on both men’s hands, and it proved to match McClellan’s.

To Rush, the hesitancy to pursue cases with white victims and black assailants too closely mirrors the shocking sworn testimony of a Department of Justice official earlier this year and the role this alleged policy played in documented voter intimidation by members of the New Black Panther Party at a Philadelphia polling place in 2008.

“Hopefully,” said Rush, “this case can be equitably adjudicated in Washington state, because it is a matter of public record that the Obama Justice Department has a directive to dismiss black-on-white civil rights violations.”

Article Source: WorldNetDaily found on DavidDuke.com

Zionist censorship helps generate more interest in Duke videos!

A few days ago, the Jewish Internet Defense Force, a group of hackers who attack websites that criticize Israel for its war crimes, bragged about how they had succeeded in forcing YouTube to delete the channel and videos of David Duke.

Now, regardless of whether you agree with Duke or not, we still have a First Amendment in this nation, and everyone gets to say their point of view, a right Israel’s supporters never fail to take constant advantage of, even as they attempt to deny it to others. Frankly, I find the prospect of a foreign nation controlling what we can see on the internet in the same fashion they already control what we see on ABCNNBBCBS far more alarming than anything Duke has to say.

As has historically been the case, the downfall of Israel’s supporters is that they cannot resist bragging about how they control America. They could not help but brag how they were in control of YouTube. Thus it comes as no surprise that First Amendment supporters are pouring Duke’s videos back onto YouTube where, because of the “Banned in Boston” effect, more people are watching them now than ever before! — -Mike Rivero


Israel’s “Cyber-Warriors” knock Duke off Youtube
By Rev. Ted Pike

The Internet was probably the least foreseen of events challenging ADL/Israel’s agenda for world control. Leaping across previously Jewish-dominated media boundaries, the worldwide web has given people of conscience unfettered privileges to criticize Jewish supremacism and misbehavior of the state of Israel.

However, in my April 27 article, “Israeli Cyber-Warriors Crash Internet,” I detail how Israel, unable to legitimately dispel overwhelming world criticism, has been marshalling hundreds of thousands of Jews worldwide into an army of internet “cyber-warriors.” These act in unison to skew polls about Israel and disproportionately flood the internet with opinion favorable to the Jewish state – and against its critics. Israel is also known to engage in active cyber-terrorism against its opponents, such as its sabotage of Syrian cyber-space preceding its September 6, 2007 aerial attack on Syria’s insipient nuclear program. The PBS news hour last week said that the particularly perverse Stuxnet worm virus, spread worldwide but heavily concentrated in Iran, probably originated in Israel.

Last week, after flooding YouTube with thousands of emails critical of David Duke, the Jewish Internet Task Force persuaded it to remove his videos. JITF claims to “promote Jewish pride,” and “Israel advocacy” and to “support Israel and fight Jew hatred and terrorism online.” Its victory announcement claims to possess “A massive, active, pro-Israel-Jewish audience…of over 270,000.” JITF boasts that Duke is only one of “THOUSANDS of channels we have been directly responsible for removing.” Any start-up Jewish organization with that level of participation is, by definition, orchestrated from Israel and supported by a myriad of Zionist groups worldwide.

Dr. David Duke's freedom of speech rights are violated.

This is an email sent out by Dr. David Duke regarding his youtube.com videos being band for "user violation".

As you are probably aware already, http://www.davidduke.com has been under withering attack from the traditional enemy. First we had a false reporting of our site as an "attack site" which Google now recognizes is not true, and then we have had what is called denial of service (DOS) attacks where our site is bombarded by tens of millions of hits until our site ceases to function. After an exhausting effort our staff got the site working again!

Then we had some bogus allegations against my YouTube channel which we are now fighting with a law firm. In the meantime, you can find the non-disputed videos on the DavidDukeTV channel.

http://www.youtube.com/user/DavidDukeTV?feature=mhum PLEASE GO TO THE CHANNEL AND VIEW EACH VIDEO!

Videos are being uploaded to the Channel with each passing hour, and I would ask you to click on each video and help get new viewership for the new channel.

We have had to engage a law firm to fight for the release of the original channel which now has over 1.6 MILLION views!

If one searches on Google videos for "David Duke" you will find many copies of all my videos as well as many of my media appearances, all told, there are at least 11 million views of these videos now and climbing steadily.

We do have to engage a law firm to fight for our rights, really your rights to free speech and free expression. My -- Duke for President -- It's Up to You -- has been taken down by Youtube along with my channel.

I sincerely hope you help us in the fight for our freedom and very existence!

Best to you,

Dr. David Duke

PS it is hard to fight the overwhelming Jewish extremist power day in an day out and I very much appreciate your support!

To send me a personal email write to info51 (AT SYMBOL) DavidDuke.com

freedom of speech?

CNN Fires Rick Sanchez After Controversial Remarks
by Associated Press
Oct 1st, 2010 | 6:03 PM

NEW YORK – CNN says that anchor Rick Sanchez has been fired, a day after he called Jon Stewart a bigot while on a radio show.

Sanchez said on a satellite radio program Thursday that Stewart is bigoted toward “everybody else that’s not like him.” The Comedy Central ‘Daily Show‘ host has frequently poked fun at Sanchez on the air.

Sanchez Calls Stewart a Bigot

Also in the interview, Sanchez mocked the suggestion that Jews are a minority, and implied that Jewish people run CNN and other media outlets.

The offensive comments included the following:

“Yeah… Very powerless people… [snickers] He’s such a minority, I mean, you know [sarcastically]… Please, what are you kidding? … I’m telling you that everybody who runs CNN is a lot like Stewart, and a lot of people who run all the other networks are a lot like Stewart, and to imply that somehow they — the people in this country who are Jewish — are an oppressed minority? Yeah.”

The statement from CNN says: “Rick Sanchez is no longer with the company. We thank Rick for his years of service and we wish him well.”
by Associated Press
Oct 1st, 2010 | 6:03 PM


Mr. Sanchez is just another victim of Jewish supremacy. It's funny, they deny that they have such power, yet they can't help but flex their muscles.


Above it states Mr. Sanchez "mocked the suggestion that Jews are an oppressed minority".
How can they be, when 48% of the U.S. Billionaires are Jewish and they make-up only 2% of the population? We all know the tremendous amount of power that comes with such tremendous amounts of money.
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws." -Mayer Amschel Rothschild.

It also states above that Mr. Sanchez "implied that Jewish people run CNN and other media outlets."
Lets see who runs CNN and other media outlets shall we?

"Four of the largest five entertainment giants are now run or owned by Jews. Rupert Murdoch's News Corp (at number four) is the only gentile holdout-however Rupert is as pro-Israel as any Jew, probably more so." -Los Angeles Jewish Times Oct. 29th 1999.
Why is it so important, to the Los Angeles Jewish Times and its readers, for Mr. Murdoch to be pro-Israel?


CNN CEO-Walter Isaacson is Jewish
Disney CEO- Robert A. Iger who is Jewish, succeeded Mr. Eisner in 2005, who is also Jewish.
Disney owns CNN, ABC, ESPN, and
Their cable network channels include :
-Lifetime
-Lifetime Movie Network
-Lifetime Real Women
-A&E Network
-The History Channel
-The Biography Channel
-History Channel International
-Military History Channel
-Crime & Investigation Network
This is just a fraction of Disney's assets. google it and see.

AOL-Time Warner, AOL was dropped from the name when account practices were questioned by government investigators. CEO- Gerald Levin is Jewish.
Time, Life, Sports Illustrated, People, Newsweek, U.S. News and World Report are also owned by Time Warmer. Google "Time Warner" for more assets, its number one of the largest five media conglomerates.


Viacom, which includes CBS Television Network, also includes 39 television stations and 185 radio stations. MTV, Nickelodeon and BET are also included under Viacom, which is also Jewish Owned. These are just a few examples. Google "Viacom" there are many more assets connected.

NBC Universal, which includes Interscope Records, the foremost promoter of "gansta rap". CNBC, MSNBC, Universal Pictures, Universal Television Group and Universal studios. Chairmen, Presidents, and Chief Operating Officers, all Jewish. Google "NBC" for more assets.
NBC's CEO Edgar Bronfman Jr. headed Seagram Company Ltd. the Liquor Giant, until its merger with Vivendi. Seagram owned universal studios. Bronfman became vice chairman of Vivendi it was originally led by gentile Jean-Marie Messier. A board of directors faction led by Bronfman forced Messier to resign in July 2002. Maybe because she wasn't as Pro Israel as Rupert Murdoch? I don't know.

Also powerful newspapers like the New York Times, which includes the Boston Globe, 12 magazines such as McCall's and Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each.
The Wall St. Journal, published along with Barons and 24 other daily newspapers. The Washington Post which also includes Newsweek, all Jewish owned. Remember, its also important to be pro-Israel, according to The Los Angeles Jewish Times.

Also book publishing, Random house, Simon and Schuster, Time Warner Trade Group including Warner books; Little, Brown; and Book of the Month Club. All except Random house are Jewish owned and operated. But Random House has many Jewish people in important positions throughout the conglomerate.

So lets recap
CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, along with other network channels owned by these Mega-media companies. Plus book publishers, record labels, movie production companies and printed newspapers and magazines, all Jewish owned but FOX. FOX is owned by a Gentile, Murdoch, who is "as pro-Israel as any Jew, probably more so". according to the L.A. Jewish Times.
He is the only gentile hold-out because if he wasn't as pro-Israel as he is said to be, I'm sure they would have found a way to buy him out or force him to resign, much like what happened to Jean-Marie Messier.

Also, with knowledge of this consolidation of power and control over the media by one demographic, do you honestly believe they will not push a biased agenda in their favor?
If you seriously think that a group of people with a foreign allegiance having total control over "our" news and entertainment media is harmless, you are extremely naive.

"In fact, the whole power technique of the communists and of the democrats consists in making people feel "free" while prompting them, quietly, to behave like obedient puppets; in making them believe that they think for themselves and act according to the dictates of their own feelings, while, all the time, they only think and feel what the guiding force of the system suggests to them through the press, the radio, the films, and other channels, and act as it wants them to. The guiding force of the system is the unseen Jew."
-Savitri Devi
This was quoted by Savitri Devi in 1949!! Makes you wonder, is it a coincidence or something more?




So, Mr. Sanchez wasn't lying.
like I had said before, Pointing out Jewish power is considered anti-semitic and anti-semitism can be punishable by imprisonment or loss of credibility and career. Exactly what happened to Mr. Sanchez.
Doesn't this in itself prove the extent of Jewish power?

Does this make the truth anti-semetic?

NAACP Bigotry in their ranks

After watching this video, besides the obvious things we could talk about, it proves that this "white privilege" all whites supposedly have, is a myth. Shirley Sherrod realizes after denying this poor white farmer, the appropriate financial help he needed based on his race, that its more about economics than "black and white".
This poor farmer could have gotten the financial help he needed if Ms. Sherrod wasn't herself, a racist.

Michael Vick and the Philadelphia Eagles; are you really surprised?

This was posted back in 2009 on KeystoneUnited.com. As this football season is about to start, I wanted to remind everyone of the crimes committed by Michael Vick. The crimes that seem to be ignored by the NFL, the Philadelphia Eagles organization, most football fans and anyone else for that matter.
You can learn more at
http://phillydogsbiteback.org/




Michael Vick and the Philadelphia Eagles; are you really surprised?
— Keith Carney

"The acceptance of any person back into a position of public influence, after helping torture and murder animals for thrills and personal gain, is something that should weigh heavily on the conscience of anyone who still retains some form of human decency. At the same time, it is also something that should put the unrestricted powers of profit into sharp perspective, at least for those of us that are still concerned about more then just touchdowns and super bowl rings. After all, Pete Rose was banned from baseball simply for betting on games. I guess that means money is worth far more than the lives of animals and humility. At least that’s what I’m getting out of it.

As a person with a deep and life long appreciation for nature and the many animals that we share this planet with, my disgust for the actions of Michael Vick along side the NFL and the Philadelphia Eagles is more than overwhelming; it’s sickening. But to be honest, what else would you expect from these types of people, really? The NFL, much like every other professional sports association, media outlet, and corporate institution, is nothing more than a machine driven by the endless quest for greed and fame, regardless of the effects it has on society in the long run.

But the question that we should really be asking ourselves is why the inexcusable actions of propped up, over paid celebrities (whether they are actors, athletes or musicians) are continuously overlooked and accepted by average citizens? Is it simply because they provide us with a form of entertainment and that we’re obsessed to the point of mindlessness? Or is it that we have become so numb to these types of events because they normally don’t have an immediate impact on us and our surroundings? I think it’s an even mixture combined with the fact that we have become far too comfortable and too lazy to actually do anything about them.

But just like all other form of tolerance, it is that type of behavior that truly worries me. Hopefully the outcries we’ve seen against the Philadelphia Eagles, the NFL and Michael Vick so far are just the tip of the iceberg."


I wanted to add a little to this story.
Animal rights activists, protested Vick's first appearance as an Eagle, in front of Lincoln Financial Field. A counter protest was headed by the N.A.A.C.P.

That sounds just a little crazy to me because this is not a race issue. On top of that, the N.A.A.C.P. is sending a terrible message, a message that sounds like they're almost in support of criminal activity. Why would the N.A.A.C.P. counter protest animal rights activists? Are they claiming that dogs are also racist?

WHY WAS THE N.A.A.C.P. THERE TO COUNTER PROTEST ANIMAL RIGHTS ACTIVISTS?

Considering that the N.A.A.C.P. stands for the National Association for the ADVANCEMENT of Colored People, why would you support a criminal? Supporting a criminal does not advance your people in anyway. It would make more sense for the N.A.A.C.P. to be protesting along side of the animal rights activists. You would think they would join the fight to keep a criminal off the impressionable minds of the black youth, who look up to these sports athletes as role models.
That would make more sense.

Then later Vick was supposedly involved or loosely involved in a shooting. Such a stand-up guy, great candidate to get the attention of the N.A.A.C.P. I'm glad our tax dollars are helping to fund such a useful and productive organization.

"Quanis Phillips, was a co-defendant of Vick in his dog fighting trial and the terms of their parole dictated that both men not socialize with one another.

Apparently, Phillips ignored that.

Quanis Phillips, a co-defendant in Vick’s dog fighting case, flew into a rage when Vick and brother Marcus Vick told him early Friday to leave the 30th-birthday party at a Virginia Beach nightclub, witnesses said.

Part of the "rage" apparently involved getting some birthday cake on Vick.

Before leaving, Phillips slapped a piece of birthday cake off a female party goer’s plate, splattering the face of the Philadelphia Eagles quarterback with frosting.

"Michael didn’t react. I was surprised," a witness at the bash said.

A witness did say however that Vick’s brother did get angry and appeared very agitated. At that point, most reports say that Vick left the party. Phillips however, continued arguing with people outside the club and was later shot in the leg." - copied from bleedgreennation.com

On top of all of this, no one seems to care at all anymore about the actions of Vick, the Eagles are winning and all is forgiven. We as a society really need to put these issues in perspective, winning meaningless sporting events or being a civilized society? He plays sports, that's it. Doesn't this seem a little ridiculous?
This is a little reminiscent to the "mob rule" of the Roman Coliseum, and we all know what happened to the Roman Empire.

The Shocking Jewish Role in Slavery Part I: What Jewish Historians Say

Obviously Zionists control our news and entertainment media, how else could this have been kept from us? It boils down to Zionists protecting Jewish victimization, while distracting whites and the rest of the world with "white guilt". That distraction allows the occupation and exploitation of white nations, by Zionists, to push the interests of Israel.

Questions and Answers

Opening your mind to other possibilities pertaining to historical events, especially political, is something a true intellectual should do. Every unpopular or unorthodox question deserves an answer, no matter how offensive the subject matter.

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
-John Adams

I guess it's easier to just live your life willfully ignorant. No matter how persuasive an argument, no matter how irrefutable the facts, people are content to live in discontent. I truly believe most people are scared of having their minds changed or cannot be bothered with the obligation that they might feel toward their people and their country.
That is exactly why the course of America and the world will never be changed.

"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent."
-Thomas Jefferson

Most people don't want to run the risk of being labeled as "brainwashed" for having questions that are supposedly already answered.
When people show that they do not have the will to question or challenge those answers, then we've become a callow society that has proven itself easily controlled.

"an attitude and a policy of control by propaganda, surveillance, misinformation, denial of truth, and manipulation of the past..." -Orwellian society

Today, seeking knowledge on sensitive subjects, brands you a modern day heretic.
I think my blog post about the Jewish involvement in the slave trade, A video by Dr. David Duke, is a perfect example of media power and influence. It's a very powerful video that shows an overwhelming amount of proof, that the Jewish dominated media is completely biased against non-Jewish Europeans.

Now, what are we going to do about this? how much more proof do we need? Are we going to continue to hide behind name calling? Am I brainwashed? Am I an anti-semite? Or am I just helping to tell the truth?

25 point plan

Below I posted the 25 point program of the NSDAP. I'm posting this because I don't think many people know the true aim of the Party. It's intent on regenerating Germany to a strong, united and independent nation is clearly pointed out below.
I couldn't find anything that would be considered "evil" as we are all programmed to believe, that National Socialism is, inherently evil.
see the month of April's blog post: "bood and soil"

"Liberal elements have labeled the program "reactionary." And conservative elements have labeled it "socialist" (i.e. "Marxist"). The two most widely read "authorities" on the subject, namely, W.L. Shirer and Alan Bullock, have vehemently denounce the Twenty-five Points in their books but have been careful to avoid actually setting forth those Points so that their readers could judge for themselves." You be the judge.
-Quoted from stormfront.org.
this blog is in no way affiliated with stormfront.org



PROGRAM OF THE NATIONAL SOCIALIST GERMAN WORKERS' PARTY
-by Gottfried Feder

The National Socialist German Workers' Party - registered as the "National Socialist German Workers' Union" - at a great mass meeting on February 25, 1920, in the Hofbrauhaus-Festsaal in Munich, announced its program to the world.

In Section 2 of the Constitution of our Party this program is declared to be unalterable. It is as follows:

The program of the German Workers' Party is limited as to period. The leaders have no intention, once the aims announced in it have been achieved, of setting up fresh ones in order to ensure the continued existence of the Party by the artificially inspired discontent of the masses.

1. We demand the union of all Germans, on the basis of the right of the self-determination of peoples, to form a Great Germany.

2. We demand equality of rights for the German people in its dealings with other nation, and abolition of the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germain.

3. We demand land and territory (colonies) for the nourishment of our people and for settling our surplus population.

4. None but members of the nation may be citizens of the State. None but those of German blood, whatever their creed, may be members of the nation. No Jew, therefore, may be a member of the nation.

5. Anyone who is not a citizen of the State may live in Germany only as a guest and must be regarded as being subject to the Alien Laws.

6. The right of voting on the leadership and laws of the State is to be enjoyed by the citizens of the State alone. We demand, therefore, that all official positions, of whatever kind, whether in the Reich, the provinces, or the small communities, shall be held by citizens of the State alone. We oppose the corrupt parliamentary custom of filling posts merely with a view to party considerations, and without reference to character or ability.

7. We demand that the State shall make it its first duty to promote the industry and livelihood of the citizens of the State. If it is not possible to nourish the entire population of the State, foreign national (non-citizens of the State) must be excluded from the Reich.

8. All further non-German immigration must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who entered Germany subsequently to August 2, 1914, shall be required forthwith to depart from the Reich.

9. All citizens of the State shall possess equal rights and duties.

10. It must be the first duty of every citizen of the State to perform mental or physical work. The activities of the individual must not clash with the interests of the whole, but must proceed within the framework of the community and must be for the general good.

We Demand Therefore:

11. Abolition of incomes unearned by work. BREAKING OF THE THRALDOM OF INTEREST.

12. In view of the enormous sacrifice of life and property demanded of a nation by every war, personal enrichment through war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. We demand, therefore, the total confiscation of all war profits.

13. We demand the nationalization of all businesses which have (hitherto) been amalgamated (into trusts).

14. We demand that there shall be profit sharing in the great industries.

15. We demand a generous development of provision for old age.

16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a healthy middle class, immediate communalization of the large department stores and their lease at a low rate to small traders, and that the most careful consideration shall be shown to all small traders in purveying to the State, the provinces, or smaller communities.

17. We demand a land reform suitable to our national requirements, the passing of a law for the confiscation without compensation of land for communal purposes, the abolition of interest on land mortgages, and prohibition of all speculation in land. [On April 13, 1928, Adolf Hitler made the following elucidation to the program: "Because of the mendacious interpretations on the part of our opponents of Point 17 of the program of the NSDAP, the following explanation is necessary.: Since the NSDAP is fundamentally based on the principle of private property, it is obvious that the expression "confiscation without compensation" refers merely to the creation of possible legal means of confiscating when necessary, land illegally acquired, or not administered in accordance with the national welfare. It is therefore directed in the first instance against the Jewish companies which speculate in land.]

18. We demand ruthless war upon all those whose activities are injurious to the common interest. Sordid criminals against the nation, usurers, profiteers, etc., must be punished with death, whatever their creed or race.

19. We demand that the Roman law, which serves the materialistic world order, shall be replaced by a German common law.

20. With the aim of opening to every capable and industrious German the possibility of higher education and consequent advancement to leading positions, the State must consider a thorough reconstruction of our national system of education. The curriculum of all educational establishments must be brought into line with the requirements of practical life. Directly the mind begins to develop the schools must aim at teaching the pupil to understand the idea of the State (State sociology). We demand the education of specially gifted children of poor parents, whatever their class or occupation, at the expense of the State.

21. The State must apply itself to raising the standard of health in the nation by protecting mothers and infants, prohibiting child labor, and increasing bodily efficiency by legally obligatory gymnastics and sports, and by extensive support of clubs engaged in the physical training of the young.

22. We demand the abolition of mercenary troops and the formation of a national army.

23. We demand legal warfare against conscious political lies and their dissemination in the press. In order to facilitate the creation of a German national press we demand that: (a) all editors, and their co-workers, of newspapers employing the German language must be members of the nation; (b) special permission from the State shall be necessary before non-German newspapers may appear (these need not necessarily be printed in the German language); ( c ) non-Germans shall be prohibited by law from participating financially in or influencing German newspapers, and the penalty for contravention of the shall be suppression of any such newspaper, and immediate deportation of the non-German involved It must be forbidden to publish newspapers which are damaging to the national welfare. We demand the legal prosecution of all tendencies in art and literature which exert a destructive influence on our national life and the closing of institutions which militate against the above-mentioned requirements.

24. We demand liberty for all religious denominations in the State, so far as they are not a danger to it and do not militate against the moral and ethical feelings of the German race. The Party, as such, stands for positive Christianity, but does not bind itself in the matter of creed to any particular confession. It combats the Jewish-materialist spirit within and without us, and is convinced that our nation can achieve permanent recovery from within only on the principle: THE COMMON INTEREST BEFORE SELF-INTEREST

25. That all the foregoing requirements may be realized we demand the creation of a strong, central national authority; unconditional authority of the central legislative body over the entire Reich and its organizations in general; and the formation of diets and vocational chambers for the purpose of executing the general laws promulgated by the Reich in the various States of the Confederation. The leaders of the Party swear to proceed regardless of consequences - if necessary at the sacrifice of their lives - toward the fulfillment of the foregoing Points.

AMERICAN GOVERNMENT "TREADS" ON PATRIOTISM

Don’t tread on me’ flags start disputes around the country.
-By Liz Goodwin

"Don't tread on me" flag at health-care protest. An Arizona man is in trouble with his homeowners' association over flying the Gadsden flag, which features a coiled rattlesnake and the words "Don't Tread on Me."

The flag has been adopted by members of the tea party movement for its association with the American Revolution, but Andy McDonel tells the New York Times that he has hung the flag from his roof simply for its historical significance.


Arizona has a state statute that allows Arizonans to fly "the Stars and Stripes, the state flag, flags representing Indian nations as well as the official flags of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and Coast Guard," the Times reports.

McDonel's homeowners' association is strictly interpreting that law to ban the flying of any other flags, including the Gadsden. The American Civil Liberties Union is defending McDonel, saying the homeowners' group is taking too strict a view of the statute and restricting McDonel's right to free speech.

McDonel is chronicling his struggle on a blog, where he is asking for donations for a potential legal battle.

McDonel isn't the only person to run into a dispute over the historic flag.

Eric Smith of Thornton, Colo., said he and his neighbor were sent a letter by their homeowners' association that said "Tea Party flags are not permitted. Please Remove." They were threatened with a $100-a-month fine for flying the Gadsden flag.

Colorado has a statue similar to Arizona's that specifies which flags are allowed to be flown. The homeowners' association eventually reversed its demand, saying his flag fell into the category of "political signs" instead of flags and was thus allowed.

[Was the tea party responsible for Joe Miller's win in Alaska?]

Meanwhile, a group of retired Marines in Connecticut is fighting for the flag to be flown over the state Capitol, after the Capitol police denied their request because the flag is not the official Marines flag.

"I'd learned about in the Marine Corps. It's one of the first, if not the first, Marine Corps flag," retired Marine Patrick Rubino told FoxNews.com. "They even flew it over our bases in Afghanistan and Iraq while I was there."

In March, House Republicans created a stir amid the hard-fought vote on health care reform by grabbing a Gadsden flag from the anti-reform crowd assembled outside the Capitol and brandishing it from within the building.

The flag is named after Col. Christopher Gadsden, a Continental Congress delegate from South Carolina. The flag was flown by the Navy in 1775 -- but owes its design to the famous "Join or Die" icon that Benjamin Franklin created in the 1750s to promote unity among American colonists. And that message seems more remote than ever, with contemporary political insurgents, colonial history buffs, state legislatures and civil liberties advocates all battling over the image's contested symbolic meaning.
-found on Yahoo news

David Duke for President? -- It's up to You!

I understand this is the longest of long shots in American history but If you think about it, David Duke is a true American Patriot, probably the most we've seen in recent history.
His plans to put "America first" and "Americans first" are the most obvious and patriotic statements I've heard coming from a potential presidential candidate, ever. Especially knowing his stance on our foreign policy and our alliance with Israel, make these cliche patriotic phrases, even more powerful and blatantly honest.

With the amount of money being poured into campaigns, that are Zionist friendly, make his run for President nearly impossible. (see Goldman Sachs and how much they contributed to both Obama and McCain)

But the most important thing of all is his campaign. Just him as a candidate will give him national news coverage. Even if his political stance is unpopular, it will place unpopular, ignored and extremely important topics up for debate. Placing "heat" on the opponent and exposing many things the media hides from us through distraction. We will have to talk about it.
The American people can hear what he has to say, straight from his mouth, not a twisted media version.


It will be extremely easy for the media to set up campaigns smearing him, non stop KKK references and racist accusations, but it will also be extremely hard to silence him on a presidential platform.

Our Founding Fathers established this government to serve its people, not the other way around. But our government has become so corrupted, it not only ignores the well being of its people and enslaves them, it has begun putting the interest of another nation ahead of its own.

Any true Patriot would recognize this and do whatever it takes to eliminate that occupancy from it's government.
Vote David Duke.

Aztlan Rising

This is a very interesting video to say the least. Liberals in American politics are pushing for liberal boarder policies, under the illusion of making America a more diverse nation. But this video is proof these Mexican immigrants, legal or illegal, do not want diversity, they want to "take their nation back". They have no intent on assimilating, no intent on being apart of a diverse nation. Their intent is clear, invade and take back "Aztlan" for the Mexicans. One of the main groups supporting Mexican immigration is a Latino nationalist group that goes by the name of "La Raza Unida" which literally translates to "our race united". Another group supporting Mexican interests is a group by the name of the National Council of La Raza (the race). They have also received government monetary support from the American taxpayers. Putting in perspective the nations majority is European so most of the money comes from white taxpayers.

This, along with Obamas recent dismissal of all charges brought against a black nationalist group, that goes by the name of "the black panther party" for violating white civil rights through voter intimidation. Obama has not only dismissed these charges, he then took it one step further to protect those who violate white civil rights with this mandate. "No voting rights case, no voter intimidation case, is to be prosecuted from this point forward if the defendant is black and the victim is white."
Not to mention white nationalist organizations are band, because they are labeled as "hate groups".
which makes you wonder, who really hates who?
And who is our government siding with? and why is our government placing the interest of minorities ahead of the nations majority?

Call me crazy but I think the people who fought for this nations freedom, its expansion and its economic growth, which has made this nation a Global power, should have the largest say in the way our nation should be operated. Its identity is clearly European. The population of America is mostly white(at one point it was 90% white, now its only 70%) the traditional holidays we celebrate are European, the language we speak comes from Europe, even traditional American foods such as hamburgers, hot dogs, pizza or apple pie. All German, polish, Italian and Dutch influences. This nation has an identity and it is not wrong to protect it. Even if our traitorous government, that has turned its back on its people who have given them the power to do so, says it is.

"No government can continue good, but under the control of the people." --Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, 1819.

Here is an example to help explain the lop-sided, hypocritical view of the world. If poor, uneducated southern whites were to move to Mexico, look for cheap labor, open stores that would only sell European American products, they would only speak English, even though the nations language is Spanish and have no intentions of assimilating.
All the while expecting the Mexican people to respect and preserve white culture, plus demand a lobby in the Mexican government to fight for white interests and civil rights. Not to mention that that lobby would be funded by the Mexican people.
How well do you think that would go over with the people of Mexico, let alone its government? Do you think we could use "racism", as the reasoning behind Mexican government ignoring our white interests?
No, we would be racist for "stealing Mexican land", because that is exactly what they are saying about Americans now, in America!

Mexico's argument is that this land is their land. They are the indigenous people and they have a point, but wars have been fought to expand the United States, just like every empire throughout history. Battles won, wars ended and borders established. The winning side now occupying a nation they have won through war, its not rocket science.
What's shocking is our government today is doing nothing to protect our established borders. Its doing nothing to protect its people, which is supposedly the bane of our governments existence. They are standing by idly while our nation is being invaded, literally. Making those who died or sacrificed almost everything in the Texas Revolution, the Mexican-American war and President Polk's efforts to expand the United States to the pacific, all in vain.

Another point I'd like to make is the people of Europe in Europe, when these people try to oppose immigration in any way to protect their indigenous homelands, it is met with hostile criticism and accusations of racism, they are labeled as racists, and most people actually believe this!
Keep in mind there is no freedom of speech in most European nations, some people have been imprisoned for speaking out in opposition to immigration, they have been arrested and charged with "hate speech".
It's obvious, if you are not of European descent, you are encouraged to preserve your heritage, learn and celebrate your cultural traditions and preserve your community and homelands. If you are of European descent, trying to do any of this, your considered a racist. I'm ranting out of frustration but this is social politics in a nut-shell.

So this raises a couple of questions, are whites entitled to anything? Where are we supposed to live? Where can we exercise our basic human rights? If we continue to live like this we will disappear. Which is obviously oppressive systematic genocide. It doesn't get more racist than that. (see earlier video blog posts "Stop the Genocide of European Mankind" and "civil rights for white people" by David Duke)

black panthers, obama and white civil rights

Not long ago in Philadelphia, black panthers we found blatantly violating voter's civil rights, voter intimidation. I'm sure your familiar with this story. Two members of the new black panther party stood outside of a voting poll, dressed intimidatingly and holding a billy club/nightstick. They were heard saying "Your about to be ruled by the black man."





This blog is in no way affiliated with electionjournal.org.

Voter intimidation is in violation of civil rights. Considering the racial make-up of the Presidential candidates, could you imagine if two white guys stood out front of a voting poll, dressed intimidatingly holding a weapon? WOW, the media would have a field day(not just fox news). The President would be outraged and would call for justice. The black panthers, the liberal media, and civil rights activists/ organizations would be there crying about their civil rights and those two white intimidators would be thrown in prison without a second thought. But what happened to the new black panthers? absolutely nothing.....
but wait there's more.

Not only did Obama and Attorney General Holder drop the charges against the black panthers who, just by their presence and demeanor, intimidated and threatened white voters. The Department of Justice also created a mandate stating that: " No voting rights case, no voter intimidation case, is to be prosecuted from this point forward if the defendant is black and the victim is white."
Civil rights? As long as the victim is white, who needs civil rights?

Not only does it seem to be socially acceptable, for a militant black nationalist group to violate white civil rights, now its protected by law.

Oliver Stone Apologizes for Truth

a social construct; race or racism?

Many people believe race is a social construct. I believe it is racism that is the social construct, here is why.

There are many different sub-species of mammals. There are many different types of Dogs, Cats, Monkey, etc. In fact there are sub-species of every animal on the planet. Different types of fish, frog, snake, etc, etc. They are all uniquely and genetically different, based off of evolution and their ability to adapt to different climates, environment and locations. This does not exclude humans. Different races act as different breeds of human, due to evolution and their ability to adapt to their environment.
Aesthetically, there are obvious differences, but some are more than skin deep. Different Races are susceptible to different ailments. In fact, doctors are known to treat the same diseases or ailments with different medicines, according to racial make-up. Some races live longer than others, some diseases only target certain races, etc. This is because of our genetic make-up, which makes every race uniquely different.

Another difference to consider is personality and intelligence.
I.Q. and other intelligence measuring test results, consistently show that Asians score the highest, Europeans in the middle, with Africans and non-white Hispanics at the bottom. Egalitarians argue that the reasoning behind whites consistently outscoring blacks and non-white Hispanics, is that these tests are culturally biased. If these tests are culturally biased toward whites, then why are Asians consistently out scoring whites in these tests?
They also believe racism is why blacks and non-white Hispanics are underrepresented in prestigious colleges, in the field of medicine, physics/mathematics and in law practice or other prestigious careers. But there are plenty of Asians in prestigious colleges and with these prestigious career titles. So, are we only racist against blacks and non-white Hispanics? or is it something deeper, something in our genetics?


One sound theory is, Europeans and Asians have lived in much harsher climates 1000's of years ago and in most cases still do. They experienced ice ages, harsh winters and always changing climate, while places closer to the equator were much milder and easily navigated. Europeans and Asians had to learn to hunt big game, utilize every part of the animal, not just for food but clothing and shelter. They had invented the wheel, weapons for hunting, and learned to build and maintain fire for an entire winter. Without this knowledge, surviving the harsh northern winters would be nearly impossible. Man and women had to work together as a team and keep their families small, otherwise it would be harder to feed many children. All of this has an affect on us today, our personalities, culture, intelligence and enginuity.
Think about the discoveries made on this planet and throughout our solar system. Think about the number of inventions, medical, mathematical, biological and other scientific advancements made by Europeans and Asians. Think about the arts; music, paintings, and the architectural creations of Europe. Think about the brilliant minds and philosophical thinkers of ancient Greece, China or Japan.
More than 90% of the world we know and use is because of European and Asian advancements, inventions and discoveries.

Tribal life in places closer to the Equator like South America, sub-Sahara Africa, South East Asia/Pacific Islands, and the Indigenous tribes of New Zealand and Australia haven't changed much, even to this day.

"Since the dawn of history the negro has owned the
continent of Africa-rich beyond the dream of poet's
fancy, crunching acres of diamonds beneath his bare
black feet. Yet he never picked one up from the dust
until a white man showed to him its glittering
light. His land swarmed with powerful and docile
animals, yet he never dreamed a harness, cart, or
sled. A hunter by necessity, he never made an axe,
spear, or arrowhead worth preserving beyond the
moment of its use. He lived as an ox, content to
graze for an hour. In a land of stone and timber he
never sawed a foot of lumber, carved a block, or
built a house save of broken sticks and mud. With
league on league of ocean strand and miles of inland
seas, for four thousand years he watched their
surface ripple under the wind, heard the thunder of
the surf on his beach, the howl of the storm over
his head, gazed on the dim blue horizon calling him
to worlds that lie beyond, and yet he never dreamed
a sail." -- Charles Darwin

"The races differ in constitution, in acclimatisation, and liability to certain diseases. Their mental characteristics are also very distinct." - Charles Darwin.



Because of our environment, we are who we are, our environment then becomes a product of us. Culture is a product of the people. Proof of that is in nations where whites are not the indigenous people but where they have populated; South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, Canada and the United States. Europeans have populated those areas and built them in their likeness, they are now more developed and less primitive.
Also, when people of underdeveloped nations populate developed or first world nations, the areas they populate resemble the third world nations they hail from. Causing progress in developed nations to slow or devolve and therefor creating the social construct of racism.

It is not racist to recognize racial differences, but it is dangerous to believe we are all equal in every way.