"if everyone is thinking alike, then no one is thinking" - Ben Franklin

The taboo topic of the holocaust is untouchable, if anyone, anywhere in the world was to question any of it, your instantly labeled as a "nut job" or "a holocaust denier" in some countries you are imprisoned! I'm not a holocaust denier but I believe we should have the freedom to question everything. If the holocaust is, without a doubt 100% fact, why not let revisionist question it?
In Germany, the punishment is 5 years imprisonment for holocaust denial, which can range from questioning one aspect of it, to down right denial of its existence.
Shouldn't there be solace in truth?
Imprisoning people who question the holocaust sounds like there is something to hide or something to protect.
I know its 2010 but it feels much more like 1984, Orwellian society is here and now.

"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." - George Orwell

One good example of a man who suffered intense persecution for his "holocaust denial" is
Paul Rassinier (1906 – 1967) he was a French pacifist, political activist, and author. He was also an Anti-Nazi French Resistance fighter, and a prisoner of the German Concentration camps at Buchenwald and Mittelbau-dora. A journalist and editor, he wrote hundreds of articles on political and economic subjects. He was viewed by "Holocaust deniers" as the father of their belief system.

Why would a man who was forced into German concentration camps, who was an Anti-Nazi, a member of the Resistance, a pacifist and a member of the French Communist Party "deny" the holocaust?
"Why would he call the allegations of gas chambers "classic examples of war propaganda that had no basis in fact." He had nothing to gain personally in postwar France by taking such an unpopular position. In fact he had much to lose, and after suffering all the hardship of the German concentration camps, he then suffered intense persecution for his courageous writings."
- Quoted from Dr. Duke's book Jewish Supremacism.

"In Europe you can freely question, ridicule and deny Jesus Christ. The same is true for the prophet Muhammad, and nothing will happen to you. But offer a single question of the smallest part of the Holocaust and you face prison."
Lefkovits, Etgar (2006-12-11). "Israel slams Iran Holocaust conference". Jerusalem Post.

"Minds are being switched off to the Holocaust dogma as it is being sold as a historical fact and yet we are not able to question it. This is mental rape." -Frederick Töben

"In fact, the whole power technique of the communists and of the democrats consists in making people feel "free" while prompting them, quietly, to behave like obedient puppets; in making them believe that they think for themselves and act according to the dictates of their own feelings, while, all the time, they only think and feel what the guiding force of the system suggests to them through the press, the radio, the films, and other channels, and act as it wants them to. The guiding force of the system is the unseen Jew."
-Savitri Devi

"Truth does not fear investigation." -David Duke.

It's funny how questioning any aspect of Christian or Islamic dogma is fine, but question anything historically relevant to Jewish life, you will be disgraced and ridiculed in the media, which has resulted in loss of credibility and career. In nations where there is no freedom of speech, you will face 5 years in prison.
Pointing out Jewish power is considered anti-semitic and anti-semitism is punishable by imprisonment.
Doesn't this in itself prove the extent of Jewish power?

Does that make the truth anti-semetic?

silence is suicide

Crime Rates

• Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
• When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.
• Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.
• The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic.

Interracial Crime

• Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
• Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.
• Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.
• Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.

Gangs

• Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.
• Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.

Incarceration

• Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million.
• Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than whites. Hispanics are three times more likely.

I'd like to add the most disgusting statistic of all. The U.S. Department of Justice shows that black males committed 36,620 sexual assaults against white females (an average of 100 rapes a day!) in 2005, while 0.0 (less than 10 per year) black females where assaulted by whites.
An average of 25,000 white women are raped EACH AND EVERY YEAR by black men.
If the reverse was happening (which I'd like to remind you is 0.0) I'm sure it would be all over the news. HBO would create a mini-series highlighting the hate driven violence innocent black women are suffering at the hands of evil and racist white men. The black community, along with its advocates, would have much to say about this disgusting truth. I'm also sure it wouldn't stop with talking.
The Rodney king verdict is the most recent and most popular example I can use. L.A. rioted! Non-whites violently targeted whites for this unfair and racially biased verdict, even though two of the officers were Hispanic.
Also, O.J. Simpson trial, this man most definitely beat his wife (white) on several occasions then finally murdering her and her lover (jewish). When he was found innocent, blacks everywhere would erupt with joy! why?

An even more important question is, why aren't white people standing together for their own people and protection? Why aren't we rioting in the streets over the fact that we and especially our women are being victimized everyday by minorities?

Maybe its because the media downplays black on white crime and the reverse receives national news coverage?




Its funny how its not only acceptable, but almost ingrained in us, to apply collective racial guilt to whites for crimes we've committed in the past(ex. slavery or segregation.) But its racist to state the fact that blacks are committing violent crimes, against whites, everyday.

Civil Rights for White People?

"Religious murder and torture was called a defense of god. In revolutionary France, the guillotining of thousands of aristocratic men, women and children was called liberty, equality and fraternity. Tens of millions were murdered in the communist gulags, in the name of "Marxist" equality. Actually more people have lost human rights in the name of equality, than any other doctrine. Not equality of opportunity mind you, but forced equality."






You know our government has created policies that are racially biased and discriminate against Whites because of the belief that we Whites are privileged, but the truth of it is, two thirds of this nation's poor is actually White. Whites are also two thirds of the population, so doesn't that tell you that the race / poor ratio is balanced?
Privileged? tell that to the Whites in the southern states of America, who everyone loves to hate. The stereotypes surrounding these people are as follows: poor, trashy, drunk, stupid rednecks who can't read and have sex with family members.
These people are far from privileged, they are forgotten. No one cares about "poor White trash" but everyone seems to have a bleeding heart for Blacks in the Ghetto.


The most powerful argument against Whites and the reason our Civil Rights are guiltlessly ignored, is the accusation and belief that all or most whites owned slaves.
Since slavery was practiced by less than 2% of Americans, 1.4% actually, according to the 1860 census.
Plus, if you add the enormous amount of Europeans who immigrated here after slavery had been abolished, and the thousands of Whites who died fighting against slavery in the civil war, means that less than one half of 1% of White Americans have ancestors who owned slaves.

So it makes sense, punish and hold all White Americans responsible today, for something less than one half of 1% took part in over 150 years ago.
If you think that sounds logical, than you are part of the problem.

This is an extremely powerful and informative video. According to a Black historian, John Hope Franklin of Duke University, 28% of free Blacks in New Orleans, which had the highest concentration of slaves in America, owned slaves. That's right, according to a Black Historian, free Blacks in America owned slaves, 28% of them to be precise.
Also slavery still exists in some parts of Africa today! And it existed there long before Whites had ever discovered the continent.
So if you think about it, Blacks are more likely to have an ancestor who owned slaves than a White person.

So lets recap.
According to the 1860 census only 1.4% of White Americans owned slaves.
Add the thousands of European immigrants, in the late 1800's and early 1900's, that had nothing to do with slavery. Plus, according to that same census in 1860, 28% of free blacks owned slaves. Finally, adding in the thousands of Whites who died fighting in the Civil war to abolish slavery, should really start to put things into perspective.
Hopefully spreading what I've learned here will begin to put an end to the guilt we feel about slavery. Especially knowing that almost 100% of us, approximately 99.5% of White Americans actually, had nothing to do with slavery.
In fact, more Whites have ancestors that died fighting a war against it.

This is exactly the kind of information that needs to be general knowledge, the fact that it isn't should really make you wonder, why? Why is this information kept from us? What's the point of keeping Whites guilt ridden and Blacks filled with resentment?
The purpose this information is kept on the hush, the reason people aren't taught about free black slave owners, is simply because it will alleviate Whites from the guilt and responsibility they are forced to bare. Traitors in our government will no longer have a foundation to build it's racially based policies on. Without a scape goat, who else could be blamed?

In the end, teaching half and exaggerated truths while at the same time ignoring certain aspects of history all together, is propaganda used to eliminate the White majority.


Want to learn more? check out the video.

"Propaganda and the destructive concepts of communism, multiculturalism, and Zionism have been deeply embedded into American culture for decades. These things can only be destroyed by rendering them useless and undermining & exposing them to the public through direct education".



"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."
-George Orwell.

Kevin MacDonald on Jews and Immigration

was america ever a white nation?

I hope this will help people understand that this multicultural/multiracial nation we have today, was not what our founding fathers had in mind.

Abraham Lincoln stated "blacks are a troublesome presence" during the Lincoln-Douglas debates he said: " I am not now or ever will be in favor of making voters or jurors of negros, nor qualifying them to hold office nor to intermarry with white people; and i will say in addition to this there is a physical difference between the white and black race which i believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And as much as they can not so live, while they do remain together there must be a position of superior and inferior, and i as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race."

Andrew Johnson: " This is a country for white men, and by God, as long as i am president, it shall be a government for white men!"

Woodrow Wilson a confirmed segragationalist and president of Princeton: "I stand for the national policy of exclusion... we can not make a homogeneous population of a people who do not blend with the caucasian race...."

Calvin Coolidge, as Vice president-elect in 1921 wrote in Good housekeeping about the basis for sound immigration policy "There are racial considerations to grave to be brushed aside for any sentimental reasons. Biological law tells us that certain divergent people will not mix or blend. Quality of mind and body suggests that the observance of ethnic law is as great a necessity to a nation as immigration law."

Henry Cabot Lodge took the view that " There is a limit to the capacity of any race for assimilating and elevating an inferior race, and when you begin to pour in unlimited numbers of people of alien or lower races of less social efficiency and less moral force, you are running the most frightful risk any people can run."

Congressman William N. Vaile of Colorado was a prominent supporter of the 1924 immigration legislation that set policy untill the revolution of the 1960s . He explains his opposition to non-white immigration this way: " Nordics need not be vain about their own qualifications. It will behooves them to be humble. What we do claim is that the northern European, and particularly Anglo Saxons made this country. Oh yes the others helped. But that is the full statement of the case. They came to this country because it was already made as an Anglo-Saxon commonwealth. They added to it, they often enriched it, but they did not make it and they have not yet greatly changed it. We are determined that they shall not. It is a good country. It suits us. And we are not going to surrender it to somebody else or allow other people, no matter what their merits, to make it something different. If there is any changing to be done we will do it ourselves"

this is taken from an essay written by Jared Taylor, published in a book called " A Race Against Time, Racial Heresies for the 21st Century"

David Duke on Irish radio