Black columnist flirts with the truth.
Here is his article.
“Why no video of looters in Japan?”
Japan’s prime minister calls the 9.0 earthquake and the following tsunami the greatest crisis in Japan since World War II. Ten thousand people are feared dead. Millions are without power, and millions sleep outdoors in cold weather. But we haven’t seen looting. So I posted this question on Facebook and Twitter.
“Race is not an issue,” Mike replied. “Third World countries like Haiti loot due to poverty. Japan is like America, an economic superpower. Plain and simple.”
“Poverty equals crime” is the standard “plain and simple” explanation, especially to the left. The analysis contains holes big enough to drive a Hummer through.
In the “economic superpower” called America, we see widespread looting following natural disasters, as well as during power blackouts, “civil unrest” and basketball team victory celebrations. If we attribute this to American poverty, what about Japanese poverty?
“Japan Tries to Face Up to Growing Poverty Problem,” read the headline of a 2010 New York Times article. Here are excerpts:
“After years of economic stagnation and widening income disparities, this once proudly egalitarian nation is belatedly waking up to the fact that it has a large and growing number of poor people. The Labor Ministry’s disclosure in October that almost one in six Japanese, or 20 million people, lived in poverty in 2007 stunned the nation and ignited a debate over possible remedies that has raged ever since.
“Many Japanese, who cling to the popular myth that their nation is uniformly middle class, were further shocked to see that Japan’s poverty rate, at 15.7 percent, was close to the … 17.1 percent in the United States, whose glaring social inequalities have long been viewed with scorn and pity here… .
{snip}
If Japan’s percentage of people living below the poverty line is about the same as ours, and if poverty causes crime, as Mike suggests, why isn’t the crime rate in Japan about the same as ours?
San Francisco’s Chinatown in the 1960s became one of the most impoverished areas in California. Public policy professors James Q. Wilson and Richard Hernstein wrote: “One neighborhood in San Francisco had the lowest income, the highest unemployment rate, the highest proportion of families with incomes under $4,000 per year, the least educational attainment, the highest tuberculosis rate and the highest proportion of substandard housing… . That neighborhood was called Chinatown. Yet, in 1965, there were only five persons of Chinese ancestry committed to prison in the entire state of California.”
Two low-income areas outside of Boston—South Boston and Roxbury—were featured several years ago in U.S. News & World Report. They had similar socio-economic profiles: high levels of unemployment; the same percentage of children born to single-parent households; and the same percentage of people living in public housing. But the violent crime rate in Roxbury, predominately black, was four times higher than that of South Boston, predominately white.
Culture and values explain why some countries and some communities experience crime, while others do not. This explains why many students from Asian countries outperform equally “disadvantaged” black and brown students from the same “underperforming” inner-city government schools.
{snip}
Culture and values explain why in Los Angeles, a city with a 46 percent Hispanic population and a 10 percentage Asian population, one sees no Latinos or Asians holding up “Will Work for Food” signs. When South Korea played for soccer’s 2010 World Cup, the Los Angeles Korean community received permits to view games on big-screen monitors in the streets near Koreatown. The police said the streets were more trash-free after the games than before.
Culture and values are not set in stone. They can and do change for the better—especially when we accept responsibility and stop blaming bad behavior on poverty. Plain and simple.
Original article
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Why the Japanese don't loot.
Jared Taylor, Special to AR News, March 14, 2011
The media are cautiously beginning to note that the earthquake/tsunami in Japan has not resulted in a single reported case of looting or even disorderly behavior. Dazed residents have gone back to smashed houses to salvage what they can, but no one worries about thieves. Thousands of homeless line up quietly and politely as they wait for emergency food and water.
The contrast with what happened after the Haiti earthquake last January or Hurricane Katrina in 2005 could not be more stark. In both cases, there was an almost immediate descent into savagery, with police officers joining in the looting. In New Orleans, evacuation centers became nightmares of violence and lawlessness, and the National Guard had to carry weapons on relief missions. In Haiti, tent cities for the quake victims became scenes of mass rape.
The next news story for today quotes two American “experts” on why the Japanese are so well behaved. Gregory Pflugfelder of Columbia University says it is because, unlike Americans, Japanese are not individualistic and care about the group. Merry White of Boston University says Americans loot and riot because of frustration over “alienation and class gaps.”
Wrong. Incapable, as usual, of considering race, they cannot see that the greatest advantage the Japanese have is that they are not black. It is impossible—and I mean impossible—to imagine any black population anywhere in the world behaving like the Japanese.
It is not just blacks. What if a catastrophe struck in Mexico or Indonesia or India or Egypt or Colombia? There would be widespread looting. Native relief agencies would make huge profits selling donated supplies rather than giving them away. Americans or Europeans who showed up with trucks of food would be mobbed. Human vileness would make the calamity vastly worse for the survivors.
Prof. White says the real question is why Americans loot, not why the Japanese don’t. Wrong again. Virtually all people loot if the forces of order are knocked out, and it has nothing to do with “individualism” or “alienation and class gaps.” That is their nature.
The “experts” are also wrong to talk about “Americans” as if there were only one kind. Everyone knows that if the lights go out there will be trouble in Detroit but not in Portland, and everyone knows why: Detroit is black and Portland is white. There would be trouble in Los Angeles, too. After the verdict in the Rodney King beating case, just as many Hispanics as blacks rioted.
Would an all-white population behave exactly like the Japanese? There might be a bit of looting and profiteering, but not much. Most whites would help their neighbors, stand in line, wait their turn. And they would probably deal harshly with looters.
Before they accepted millions of non-white immigrants, Northern Europeans would have behaved much like the Japanese. Swedes, Scots, Dutchmen, Germans, Danes—wherever they are still undiluted by immigrants they can be counted on to show courage, restraint, and dignity.
But again, these peoples are exceptions. They are exceptions for reasons that are largely genetic but also cultural. Whites and north Asians have high average IQs, but also what could be called an “average personality” that is less psychopathic, more disciplined, more public spirited. We see this in every aspect of the societies they build, not just in how they respond to tragedy. Their societies have little crime, illegitimacy, littering, or graffiti. They have high levels of public order, trust, and courtesy.
Only a few populations are capable of building such societies, and they are vastly superior to all others. That, of course, is why so many people from failed societies want to immigrate, but when they come in sufficient numbers they destroy what they came to find.
Things would have been far different in Japan if the country had admitted large numbers of, say, Malays or Pakistanis. So far, Japan has wisely limited Third-World immigration, and can face a catastrophe with the conviction that all Japanese are united both in suffering and in the struggle to rebuild. Japan is far better prepared to face calamity than America or Europe because Japan has had the wisdom to remain Japanese.
The media are cautiously beginning to note that the earthquake/tsunami in Japan has not resulted in a single reported case of looting or even disorderly behavior. Dazed residents have gone back to smashed houses to salvage what they can, but no one worries about thieves. Thousands of homeless line up quietly and politely as they wait for emergency food and water.
The contrast with what happened after the Haiti earthquake last January or Hurricane Katrina in 2005 could not be more stark. In both cases, there was an almost immediate descent into savagery, with police officers joining in the looting. In New Orleans, evacuation centers became nightmares of violence and lawlessness, and the National Guard had to carry weapons on relief missions. In Haiti, tent cities for the quake victims became scenes of mass rape.
The next news story for today quotes two American “experts” on why the Japanese are so well behaved. Gregory Pflugfelder of Columbia University says it is because, unlike Americans, Japanese are not individualistic and care about the group. Merry White of Boston University says Americans loot and riot because of frustration over “alienation and class gaps.”
Wrong. Incapable, as usual, of considering race, they cannot see that the greatest advantage the Japanese have is that they are not black. It is impossible—and I mean impossible—to imagine any black population anywhere in the world behaving like the Japanese.
It is not just blacks. What if a catastrophe struck in Mexico or Indonesia or India or Egypt or Colombia? There would be widespread looting. Native relief agencies would make huge profits selling donated supplies rather than giving them away. Americans or Europeans who showed up with trucks of food would be mobbed. Human vileness would make the calamity vastly worse for the survivors.
Prof. White says the real question is why Americans loot, not why the Japanese don’t. Wrong again. Virtually all people loot if the forces of order are knocked out, and it has nothing to do with “individualism” or “alienation and class gaps.” That is their nature.
The “experts” are also wrong to talk about “Americans” as if there were only one kind. Everyone knows that if the lights go out there will be trouble in Detroit but not in Portland, and everyone knows why: Detroit is black and Portland is white. There would be trouble in Los Angeles, too. After the verdict in the Rodney King beating case, just as many Hispanics as blacks rioted.
Would an all-white population behave exactly like the Japanese? There might be a bit of looting and profiteering, but not much. Most whites would help their neighbors, stand in line, wait their turn. And they would probably deal harshly with looters.
Before they accepted millions of non-white immigrants, Northern Europeans would have behaved much like the Japanese. Swedes, Scots, Dutchmen, Germans, Danes—wherever they are still undiluted by immigrants they can be counted on to show courage, restraint, and dignity.
But again, these peoples are exceptions. They are exceptions for reasons that are largely genetic but also cultural. Whites and north Asians have high average IQs, but also what could be called an “average personality” that is less psychopathic, more disciplined, more public spirited. We see this in every aspect of the societies they build, not just in how they respond to tragedy. Their societies have little crime, illegitimacy, littering, or graffiti. They have high levels of public order, trust, and courtesy.
Only a few populations are capable of building such societies, and they are vastly superior to all others. That, of course, is why so many people from failed societies want to immigrate, but when they come in sufficient numbers they destroy what they came to find.
Things would have been far different in Japan if the country had admitted large numbers of, say, Malays or Pakistanis. So far, Japan has wisely limited Third-World immigration, and can face a catastrophe with the conviction that all Japanese are united both in suffering and in the struggle to rebuild. Japan is far better prepared to face calamity than America or Europe because Japan has had the wisdom to remain Japanese.
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Zionist Running Dog Obama and the UN Veto
Obama vetoed a unanimous UN Security Resolution condemning Israel for its 44 year ongoing theft of Palestinian land. This video examines the deeper ramifications and realities behind that veto.
Sunday, February 13, 2011
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Immigration and the Moral Right to Save Europe and the West!
Great video, this documentary shows how diversity within nations causes degeneracy, dysfunction and conflict. the U.N. reports that 80% of turmoil within nations is ethnically charged, meaning these conflicts are racially or culturally motivated. The Middle East is a perfect example of how diversity "works". Catholics, Muslims, and Jews are harmoniously living side by side. What turmoil? What "war on terror?" What do you mean? They are a collection of strong, stable and functional nations because of diversity... HA!
I truly believe diversity is an amazing thing, GLOBALLY, diversity within a nation is disastrous. Just look at America, as for race relations, people are far from content, they're not even close to civil. It's time to stop integrating the areas the races have made for themselves. Self segregation is evident everywhere in America, even Whites self segregated from other whites when they first arrived evidence of that is everywhere. Irish, Italian, Polish, German, along with Chinese and other Asian nationals, Hispanics and Blacks separated themselves.
Even today every city has a section designated for each of these groups, except today its slightly more integrated. Irish, Italian, Polish, etc. are living together now, it's more of a division of race than nationality, why? because that is what comes natural to people, you feel most at home and comfortable when you surround yourself with things you are familiar with. They have been doing it since the dawn of time. Just look at the continents, the people have more in common with whom they share their respective continents. Europeans have more in common with other Europeans than they do with Africans, and vice versa. That's exactly why people live with who they live with, and have since they walked the earth.
There is nothing wrong with that! Why force people to do something that has NEVER happened naturally?
We can share the globe, but we can NOT share a nation.
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Rogue Physicial Murders Hundreds of Babies
Hundreds of children were murdered inside Dr. Kermit Gosnell's West Philly Medical Center. The Philadelphia doctor was charged with murdering babies for decades, The Grand Jury stated that the death toll was literally incalculable.
The District Attorney's Office can only assemble enough evidence to charge for eight murders, seven of those victims were babies.
According to the Grand Jury:
Baby Boy A. was born to a 17 year old black female who was almost 30 weeks pregnant. The infant was "breathing and moving when Dr. Gosnell severed his spine and put the body in a plastic shoe box for disposal"
Baby Boy B. At least 28 weeks of gestational age, was found frozen in a 1 gallon spring water bottle.
Baby Boy C. Moved and breathed for 20 minutes before an assistant came in and cut the spinal cord."
These are not abortions, obviously, this is cold blooded murder with total disregard for human life. Babies, new born babies, how could anyone bring themselves to do such things?
Gosnell's typical way of killing these babies was to use scissors to cut the spinal cord of these living, breathing, babies.
Embryos, fetuses, and corpses of babies were stashed in milk jugs, spring water bottles and cat food containers! Even more were bundled in red and yellow plastic bags stacked high on the dirt floor basement and packed into the freezer. It has also been reported that Gosnell kept a collection of small jars containing the severed feet of fetuses. The remains of 45 fetuses were recovered the night his "medical center" was raided.
This sounds like something out of a B-rate horror/gore film, or something that you would find in a 3rd world country and read about in Time magazine.
Gosnell had employed high school students, failed wannabe doctors and other unqualified people to help perform these "abortions", they were payed in cash.
One of them was a telemarketer posing as a doctor! Not only is a telemarketer not qualified to perform "abortions", apparently neither was Dr. Gosnell, he was not a qualified OBGYN. One of his patients died in his "care". She was given a lethal dose of pain killers and drugs to induce labor.
Induce labor! These people, who were highly unqualified to even be babysitters let alone medical doctors, were giving the women who walked into the medical center drug cocktails that would sedate them and induce labor.
Sometimes this would last up to 3 days, according to a women who worked with Gosnell for more than 8 years, "If a baby was about to come out, I would take the women into the bathroom, they would sit on the toilet and the baby would basically just fall out and be in the toilet." This happened so often the clinics janitor refused to pull anymore flesh out of the plumbing.
She also said "If the babies haven't come out in the toilet, we would push and shove on patients stomachs".
Maximizing pain and danger for his patients, Gosnell minimized work and costs to himself. "labor without labor."
This is basically a summary of what I had read in an article in the very liberal Philadelphia Weekly. They go on to say that this was able to go on for so long and was ignored because of institutional racism and sexism in America.
The funny thing is Dr. Gosnell is BLACK, almost 100% of his patients were BLACK, West Philadelphia is predominantly BLACK and most of his "doctors" and assistants were also BLACK. How in the world is this a product of Racism?
Sexism, sadism, and inhumanity on the part of "Dr." Gosnell and his assistants, definitely, but racism? I fail to see it.
What I don't fail to see are the parallels in Dr. Gosnelll's "practice" and the way women are treated in Africa. Some tribes force women to have a clitoridectomy which is the shaving away of the clitoris. Others "iron" down the breasts of maturing women, as to not attract men too early. They literally use blazing hot wooden pokers to press down the protruding breasts till they disappear. I believe this actually protects them from the men in their area, protects them from, well, rape.
- "Rape statistics from South Africa are so shocking as to be almost unbelievable - women's rights activists say one South African is raped every 26 seconds".
Also, men would protect themselves from the AIDS virus by practicing what they call, "dry sex", it consist of shoving leaves and sand inside of women before sex.
The most disgusting one of all is what the men who were infected with the AIDS virus would do to young, adolescent women and sometimes babies. They believed that having sex with a virgin would cure them, they believed sex with a virgin would cure them of AIDS. So, you could imagine the number of young women and babies, sometimes newborn, who were torn from the arms of their mothers, to cure a rapist of AIDS.
Of course these horror stories are blamed on the lack of education these people have About the AIDS virus. No amount of Ignorance about the AIDS virus could justify these actions. Think about it, do you really need to teach people not to rape babies or underage, virgin women for their own gratification, even if that gratification is to cure a disease?
Don't believe me? just google "baby rape in Africa" and research it for yourself.
These practices are a sign of extreme selfishness and sexism withing the culture of these people. This is all "normal" in some parts of Africa with no White influence or oppression. What is also "normal" in parts of Africa is slavery, which is still practiced today.
What has happened in Gosnell's medical center has absolutely nothing to do with whites oppressing blacks, in my opinion it has everything to do with their culture and way of life. His complete disregard for human life is so evident in the report above I can't believe that his sick practices are being blamed on Whites or institutional racism. Where does it end?
Why is it that everything that is found to be purely disgusting to us is blamed on us? High murder, rape and general violent crime rates are all blamed on "institutional racism". Can they do no wrong?
He was well educated and graduated from Thomas Jefferson University, Jefferson Medical College. This school is ranked #59 out of 144. His education and economic status, make no difference. He and his patients are still victims of Institutional Racism. And somehow we whites are all to blame for this sick, inhumane, piece of garbage.
If you completely ignore the fact that we are different people with different perceptions of normalcy, different ways of living out our lives, culturally and traditionally, you are a victim of a server and total media brainwashing. Believing that whites are to blame for the culture clashes between the races of man, is a cheap and gutless way out of dealing with the truth.
We are not the same and believing we are, literally puts us in danger. Here is the dangerous truth: The U.S. Department of Justice shows that black males committed 36,620 sexual assaults against white females (an average of 100 rapes a day!) in 2005, while 0.0 (less than 10 per year) black females where assaulted by whites.
An average of 25,000 white women are raped EACH AND EVERY YEAR by black men.
This will not end until we hold someone, other than ourselves(whites), responsible.
The District Attorney's Office can only assemble enough evidence to charge for eight murders, seven of those victims were babies.
According to the Grand Jury:
Baby Boy A. was born to a 17 year old black female who was almost 30 weeks pregnant. The infant was "breathing and moving when Dr. Gosnell severed his spine and put the body in a plastic shoe box for disposal"
Baby Boy B. At least 28 weeks of gestational age, was found frozen in a 1 gallon spring water bottle.
Baby Boy C. Moved and breathed for 20 minutes before an assistant came in and cut the spinal cord."
These are not abortions, obviously, this is cold blooded murder with total disregard for human life. Babies, new born babies, how could anyone bring themselves to do such things?
Gosnell's typical way of killing these babies was to use scissors to cut the spinal cord of these living, breathing, babies.
Embryos, fetuses, and corpses of babies were stashed in milk jugs, spring water bottles and cat food containers! Even more were bundled in red and yellow plastic bags stacked high on the dirt floor basement and packed into the freezer. It has also been reported that Gosnell kept a collection of small jars containing the severed feet of fetuses. The remains of 45 fetuses were recovered the night his "medical center" was raided.
This sounds like something out of a B-rate horror/gore film, or something that you would find in a 3rd world country and read about in Time magazine.
Gosnell had employed high school students, failed wannabe doctors and other unqualified people to help perform these "abortions", they were payed in cash.
One of them was a telemarketer posing as a doctor! Not only is a telemarketer not qualified to perform "abortions", apparently neither was Dr. Gosnell, he was not a qualified OBGYN. One of his patients died in his "care". She was given a lethal dose of pain killers and drugs to induce labor.
Induce labor! These people, who were highly unqualified to even be babysitters let alone medical doctors, were giving the women who walked into the medical center drug cocktails that would sedate them and induce labor.
Sometimes this would last up to 3 days, according to a women who worked with Gosnell for more than 8 years, "If a baby was about to come out, I would take the women into the bathroom, they would sit on the toilet and the baby would basically just fall out and be in the toilet." This happened so often the clinics janitor refused to pull anymore flesh out of the plumbing.
She also said "If the babies haven't come out in the toilet, we would push and shove on patients stomachs".
Maximizing pain and danger for his patients, Gosnell minimized work and costs to himself. "labor without labor."
This is basically a summary of what I had read in an article in the very liberal Philadelphia Weekly. They go on to say that this was able to go on for so long and was ignored because of institutional racism and sexism in America.
The funny thing is Dr. Gosnell is BLACK, almost 100% of his patients were BLACK, West Philadelphia is predominantly BLACK and most of his "doctors" and assistants were also BLACK. How in the world is this a product of Racism?
Sexism, sadism, and inhumanity on the part of "Dr." Gosnell and his assistants, definitely, but racism? I fail to see it.
What I don't fail to see are the parallels in Dr. Gosnelll's "practice" and the way women are treated in Africa. Some tribes force women to have a clitoridectomy which is the shaving away of the clitoris. Others "iron" down the breasts of maturing women, as to not attract men too early. They literally use blazing hot wooden pokers to press down the protruding breasts till they disappear. I believe this actually protects them from the men in their area, protects them from, well, rape.
- "Rape statistics from South Africa are so shocking as to be almost unbelievable - women's rights activists say one South African is raped every 26 seconds".
Also, men would protect themselves from the AIDS virus by practicing what they call, "dry sex", it consist of shoving leaves and sand inside of women before sex.
The most disgusting one of all is what the men who were infected with the AIDS virus would do to young, adolescent women and sometimes babies. They believed that having sex with a virgin would cure them, they believed sex with a virgin would cure them of AIDS. So, you could imagine the number of young women and babies, sometimes newborn, who were torn from the arms of their mothers, to cure a rapist of AIDS.
Of course these horror stories are blamed on the lack of education these people have About the AIDS virus. No amount of Ignorance about the AIDS virus could justify these actions. Think about it, do you really need to teach people not to rape babies or underage, virgin women for their own gratification, even if that gratification is to cure a disease?
Don't believe me? just google "baby rape in Africa" and research it for yourself.
These practices are a sign of extreme selfishness and sexism withing the culture of these people. This is all "normal" in some parts of Africa with no White influence or oppression. What is also "normal" in parts of Africa is slavery, which is still practiced today.
What has happened in Gosnell's medical center has absolutely nothing to do with whites oppressing blacks, in my opinion it has everything to do with their culture and way of life. His complete disregard for human life is so evident in the report above I can't believe that his sick practices are being blamed on Whites or institutional racism. Where does it end?
Why is it that everything that is found to be purely disgusting to us is blamed on us? High murder, rape and general violent crime rates are all blamed on "institutional racism". Can they do no wrong?
He was well educated and graduated from Thomas Jefferson University, Jefferson Medical College. This school is ranked #59 out of 144. His education and economic status, make no difference. He and his patients are still victims of Institutional Racism. And somehow we whites are all to blame for this sick, inhumane, piece of garbage.
If you completely ignore the fact that we are different people with different perceptions of normalcy, different ways of living out our lives, culturally and traditionally, you are a victim of a server and total media brainwashing. Believing that whites are to blame for the culture clashes between the races of man, is a cheap and gutless way out of dealing with the truth.
We are not the same and believing we are, literally puts us in danger. Here is the dangerous truth: The U.S. Department of Justice shows that black males committed 36,620 sexual assaults against white females (an average of 100 rapes a day!) in 2005, while 0.0 (less than 10 per year) black females where assaulted by whites.
An average of 25,000 white women are raped EACH AND EVERY YEAR by black men.
This will not end until we hold someone, other than ourselves(whites), responsible.
Monday, December 27, 2010
die for lies
This was posted in 2005 on DavidDuke.com
I stumbled across it while doing some laid back research.
Why Cindy Sheehan is Right!
By David Duke
Cindy Sheehan, a mother who lost a son in the Iraq War, is determined to prevent other mothers and fathers from experiencing the same loss.
Courageously she has gone to Texas near the ranch of President Bush and braved the elements and a hostile Jewish supremacist media to demand a meeting with him and a good explanation why her son and other’s sons and daughters must die and be disfigured in a war for Israel rather than for America.
Recently, she had the courage to state the obvious that her son signed up in the military to protect America not to die for Israel.
In a recent letter to “Nightline,” she wrote the following hard-hitting words:
Am I emotional? Yes, my first born was murdered. Am I angry? Yes, he was killed for lies and for a PNAC Neo-Con agenda to benefit Israel. My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel. Am I stupid? No, I know full-well that my son, my family, this nation, and this world were betrayed by George [W.] Bush who was influenced by the neo-con PNAC agenda after 9/11. We were told that we were attacked on 9/11 because the terrorists hate our freedoms and democracy…not for the real reason, because the Arab-Muslims who attacked us hate our middle-eastern foreign policy. That hasn’t changed since America invaded and occupied Iraq…in fact it has gotten worse.
Now, a gauntlet of personal attacks has been let out against her. A recent article on David Horowitz’s FrontPage and repeated by many pro-Israel zealots dares to compare her with that incorrigible American, me. Here is a FrontPage reader’s commentary published in the Lonestar Times.
…(Sheehan) voiced vaguely anti-Semitic rhetoric when she alleged that the Iraq War was all about protecting Israel, i.e. a Jewish conspiracy (a similar opinion is frequently expressed by David Duke and his ilk).” — From the Lonestar Times August, 13, 2005
In truth, Cindy Sheehan is absolutely right. Her son signed up in the military to defend America, not Israel, and to safeguard our own democracy, not the democracy of some foreign nation that neither wants nor needs it. In advancing this war for Israel, government and media advocates obviously couldn’t get Americans behind the war by saying it was a war for Israel. They had to make up bogus reasons for the war, such as saying that Iraq was an imminent threat to America and that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Now that these lies have been exposed, they have changed the rationale for the war to “fighting for democracy” and “fighting against terrorism.” Here’s a short list showing why Cindy Sheehan is right!
1) It was criminal for Cindy Sheehan’s son to die for Israel rather than for the true interests of America.
From the beginning, this war was orchestrated from top to bottom by Jewish Neocons that saw the war as one for Israel’s strategic objectives. They ramped up the war through Jews such as Perle and Wolfowitz, the false intelligence through CIA analyst Stuart Cohen and by Israel’s Mossad, and had a compliant Jewish-dominated media to cheer on the war. The truth is the Iraq War has inflicted incredible damage on America and the American people. It is war against America rather than in defense of America.
2) It was criminal to send her son to die for a lie.
There were no weapons of mass destruction, no nuclear program, no uranium from Niger, no links with Al Qaeda, no imminent threat to the American people. Every reason the American people were given for going to war has turned out to be a lie.
3) It is criminal for her son to be forced to die for democracy in other ountries.
If Americans were sent to die for democracy or justice in all the countries of the world we deem unjust or undemocratic, then we must be ready to send millions of our sons and daughters to war all over the globe.
4) The lie that her son died for the good of the Iraqi People is false on its face.
Hundreds of thousands of Iraq men women and children have been killed, injured, made homeless and suffered from this war. You don’t save people by destroying their homes and hospitals, and throwing their country in chaos.
5) The Iraq war and her son’s death did not defend American from hatred or terrorism.
In fact, the war is massively increasing hatred and terrorism. For every one terrorist killed in Iraq, we are creating thousands more who hate and want to hurt America and Americans. This is the surest way to lose the war on terror not win it.
6) Cindy Sheehan’s son died for no true interest for the American people.
It has secured us no new or cheaper oil, it has cost a national treasure of hundreds of billions of dollars, it has alienated friends and allies, it has hurt American business around the world, it has separated and caused hardship upon millions of American military and National Guard families. It has killed almost 2000 and maimed tens of thousands of loyal and brave Americans who do their duty in Iraq. Again, this is war against every true interest of the America. The only nation that benefits from it is Israel!
Cindy Sheehan has a lot to be angry about. Her son was betrayed and his life lost by government officials who treasonably created and continue a war for Israel and the Jewish supremacist agenda rather than that of the United States.
We stand with Cindy Sheehan and the memory of her son which should spur all truly patriotic Americans to demand an end to this war for Israel, this war against America, the Iraq War.
It is not Iraq’s borders that need protecting, it is the American border with Mexico!
(see blog post "Aztlan Rising" in August archives, for more on this subject.)
Support our troops…bring them home!
Let them protect America and not die for Israel.
Sincerely,
David Duke
I stumbled across it while doing some laid back research.
Why Cindy Sheehan is Right!
By David Duke
Cindy Sheehan, a mother who lost a son in the Iraq War, is determined to prevent other mothers and fathers from experiencing the same loss.
Courageously she has gone to Texas near the ranch of President Bush and braved the elements and a hostile Jewish supremacist media to demand a meeting with him and a good explanation why her son and other’s sons and daughters must die and be disfigured in a war for Israel rather than for America.
Recently, she had the courage to state the obvious that her son signed up in the military to protect America not to die for Israel.
In a recent letter to “Nightline,” she wrote the following hard-hitting words:
Am I emotional? Yes, my first born was murdered. Am I angry? Yes, he was killed for lies and for a PNAC Neo-Con agenda to benefit Israel. My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel. Am I stupid? No, I know full-well that my son, my family, this nation, and this world were betrayed by George [W.] Bush who was influenced by the neo-con PNAC agenda after 9/11. We were told that we were attacked on 9/11 because the terrorists hate our freedoms and democracy…not for the real reason, because the Arab-Muslims who attacked us hate our middle-eastern foreign policy. That hasn’t changed since America invaded and occupied Iraq…in fact it has gotten worse.
Now, a gauntlet of personal attacks has been let out against her. A recent article on David Horowitz’s FrontPage and repeated by many pro-Israel zealots dares to compare her with that incorrigible American, me. Here is a FrontPage reader’s commentary published in the Lonestar Times.
…(Sheehan) voiced vaguely anti-Semitic rhetoric when she alleged that the Iraq War was all about protecting Israel, i.e. a Jewish conspiracy (a similar opinion is frequently expressed by David Duke and his ilk).” — From the Lonestar Times August, 13, 2005
In truth, Cindy Sheehan is absolutely right. Her son signed up in the military to defend America, not Israel, and to safeguard our own democracy, not the democracy of some foreign nation that neither wants nor needs it. In advancing this war for Israel, government and media advocates obviously couldn’t get Americans behind the war by saying it was a war for Israel. They had to make up bogus reasons for the war, such as saying that Iraq was an imminent threat to America and that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Now that these lies have been exposed, they have changed the rationale for the war to “fighting for democracy” and “fighting against terrorism.” Here’s a short list showing why Cindy Sheehan is right!
1) It was criminal for Cindy Sheehan’s son to die for Israel rather than for the true interests of America.
From the beginning, this war was orchestrated from top to bottom by Jewish Neocons that saw the war as one for Israel’s strategic objectives. They ramped up the war through Jews such as Perle and Wolfowitz, the false intelligence through CIA analyst Stuart Cohen and by Israel’s Mossad, and had a compliant Jewish-dominated media to cheer on the war. The truth is the Iraq War has inflicted incredible damage on America and the American people. It is war against America rather than in defense of America.
2) It was criminal to send her son to die for a lie.
There were no weapons of mass destruction, no nuclear program, no uranium from Niger, no links with Al Qaeda, no imminent threat to the American people. Every reason the American people were given for going to war has turned out to be a lie.
3) It is criminal for her son to be forced to die for democracy in other ountries.
If Americans were sent to die for democracy or justice in all the countries of the world we deem unjust or undemocratic, then we must be ready to send millions of our sons and daughters to war all over the globe.
4) The lie that her son died for the good of the Iraqi People is false on its face.
Hundreds of thousands of Iraq men women and children have been killed, injured, made homeless and suffered from this war. You don’t save people by destroying their homes and hospitals, and throwing their country in chaos.
5) The Iraq war and her son’s death did not defend American from hatred or terrorism.
In fact, the war is massively increasing hatred and terrorism. For every one terrorist killed in Iraq, we are creating thousands more who hate and want to hurt America and Americans. This is the surest way to lose the war on terror not win it.
6) Cindy Sheehan’s son died for no true interest for the American people.
It has secured us no new or cheaper oil, it has cost a national treasure of hundreds of billions of dollars, it has alienated friends and allies, it has hurt American business around the world, it has separated and caused hardship upon millions of American military and National Guard families. It has killed almost 2000 and maimed tens of thousands of loyal and brave Americans who do their duty in Iraq. Again, this is war against every true interest of the America. The only nation that benefits from it is Israel!
Cindy Sheehan has a lot to be angry about. Her son was betrayed and his life lost by government officials who treasonably created and continue a war for Israel and the Jewish supremacist agenda rather than that of the United States.
We stand with Cindy Sheehan and the memory of her son which should spur all truly patriotic Americans to demand an end to this war for Israel, this war against America, the Iraq War.
It is not Iraq’s borders that need protecting, it is the American border with Mexico!
(see blog post "Aztlan Rising" in August archives, for more on this subject.)
Support our troops…bring them home!
Let them protect America and not die for Israel.
Sincerely,
David Duke
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)